國立虎尾科技大學 |

An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics // Heesoo Jang.
作者:	Jang, Heesoo,
面頁冊數:	1 electronic resource (258 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-02B.
標題:	Film studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482608
ISBN:	9798383687659

An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics /
Jang, Heesoo,

An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics /Heesoo Jang. - 1 electronic resource (258 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.

This dissertation project explores the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics public discourse through a comprehensive methodological approach that combines computational tools with qualitative grounded theory. The research aims to identify and analyze the frames around AI ethics available to the public, referred to as issue culture, investigating the dominance of specific frames within AI ethics discussions and the power dynamics shaping these conversations. Methodologically, the study employs Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling and community detection techniques to uncover latent themes and relationships within datasets from news media, congressional records, and Big AI companies' documents collected over a nine-year period from January 2015 to December 2023. The data collection involved compiling extensive corpora of text from these diverse sources, ensuring a robust and representative sample of public discourse on AI ethics. From each actor, top documents from identified topics were sampled for qualitative analysis. Through qualitative analysis, eleven distinct frames were identified, including the Inevitable AI Frame, the Ends-oriented AI Frame, the Human-AI Collaboration Frame, the AI Race Frame, the Racial Injustice in AI Frame, the National Security and Defense Preparedness Frame, the Bipartisan Cooperation Frame, the Digital Transparency Frame, the Strategic Ecosystem Frame, the Responsible AI Frame, and the "Efficiency is Sustainable" Frame. The findings reveal the prevalence and influence of these frames across different actors, with certain frames being particularly dominant across actors. These frames emphasized themes such as collaboration, competition, goal-orientation, and ethics. This research advances the methodological framework for studying public discourse by integrating computational methods with qualitative insights, providing a comprehensive analysis of the framing processes, in this case within AI ethics discussions. The study's significance lies in its contribution to a deeper understanding of AI ethics, highlighting the role of powerful actors in framing the public discourse of AI ethics. The results and discussions offer critical insights for policymakers, journalists, and the public, which could be used to advance a more balanced and inclusive dialogue on AI ethics. Future research directions include expanding the scope of datasets to include more diverse sources of public discourse and integrating normative theory through an abductive approach to grounded theory.

English

ISBN: 9798383687659Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179264
Film studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Artificial intelligence ethics

An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics /
LDR:04131nam a22004573i 4500 001 1157842
005 20250603111426.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 250804s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798383687659
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31482608
035 $a AAI31482608
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Jang, Heesoo, $e author. $3 1484120
245 1 3 $a An Integrative Framing Study of the Public Discourse Around AI Ethics / $c Heesoo Jang.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (258 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisors: McGregor, Shannon C. Committee members: Freelon, Deen; Hanna, Alex; Lee, Suman; Saldana, Magdalena.
502 $b Ph.D. $c The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $d 2024.
520 $a This dissertation project explores the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics public discourse through a comprehensive methodological approach that combines computational tools with qualitative grounded theory. The research aims to identify and analyze the frames around AI ethics available to the public, referred to as issue culture, investigating the dominance of specific frames within AI ethics discussions and the power dynamics shaping these conversations. Methodologically, the study employs Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling and community detection techniques to uncover latent themes and relationships within datasets from news media, congressional records, and Big AI companies' documents collected over a nine-year period from January 2015 to December 2023. The data collection involved compiling extensive corpora of text from these diverse sources, ensuring a robust and representative sample of public discourse on AI ethics. From each actor, top documents from identified topics were sampled for qualitative analysis. Through qualitative analysis, eleven distinct frames were identified, including the Inevitable AI Frame, the Ends-oriented AI Frame, the Human-AI Collaboration Frame, the AI Race Frame, the Racial Injustice in AI Frame, the National Security and Defense Preparedness Frame, the Bipartisan Cooperation Frame, the Digital Transparency Frame, the Strategic Ecosystem Frame, the Responsible AI Frame, and the "Efficiency is Sustainable" Frame. The findings reveal the prevalence and influence of these frames across different actors, with certain frames being particularly dominant across actors. These frames emphasized themes such as collaboration, competition, goal-orientation, and ethics. This research advances the methodological framework for studying public discourse by integrating computational methods with qualitative insights, providing a comprehensive analysis of the framing processes, in this case within AI ethics discussions. The study's significance lies in its contribution to a deeper understanding of AI ethics, highlighting the role of powerful actors in framing the public discourse of AI ethics. The results and discussions offer critical insights for policymakers, journalists, and the public, which could be used to advance a more balanced and inclusive dialogue on AI ethics. Future research directions include expanding the scope of datasets to include more diverse sources of public discourse and integrating normative theory through an abductive approach to grounded theory.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0153
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 1179264
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 659797
653 $a Artificial intelligence ethics
653 $a Computational grounded theory
653 $a Framing
653 $a Issue culture
653 $a Public discourse
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0800
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0391
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Journalism (Mass Communication). $3 1181391
720 1 $a McGregor, Shannon C. $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-02B.
790 $a 0153
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31482608