國立虎尾科技大學 |

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Money, mandates, and local control in American public education/ Bryan Shelly.
Author:	Shelly, Bryan.
Published:	Ann Arbor :University of Michigan Press, : 2011.,
Description:	1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) :ill. :
Subject:	EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General -
Online resource:	Full text available:
ISBN:	9780472026739 (electronic bk.)

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education
Shelly, Bryan.

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education[electronic resource] /Bryan Shelly. - Ann Arbor :University of Michigan Press,2011. - 1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) :ill.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"'This book is outstanding. . . . No one has delved into the issue of school financing with such depth, data and thoughtful analysis. It issimply the best in the field.' Susan B. Neuman, University of MichiganPointing to the disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts in areas where revenue depends primarily upon local taxes, reformers repeatedly call for the centralization of school funding.Their proposals meet resistance from citizens, elected officials, and school administrators who fear the loss of local autonomy.Bryan Shelly finds, however, that local autonomy hasalready been compromised by federal and state governments, which exercise a tremendous amount of control over public education despite their small contribution to a school systems funding. This disproportionate relationship between funding and control allows state and federal officials to pass education policy yet excuses them from supplying adequate funding for new programs. The resulting unfunded and underfunded mandates and regulations, Shelly insists, are the true cause of the loss of community control over public education. Hedemonstrates the effects of the most infamous of underfunded federal mandates, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and explores why schools implemented it despite its unpopularity and out-of-pocket costs. Shellys findings hold significant implications for school finance reform, NCLB, and the future of intergovernmental relations."--

ISBN: 9780472026739 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Topical Terms:

834709
EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General

LC Class. No.: LB2825 / .S45 2011

Dewey Class. No.: 379.73

Money, mandates, and local control in American public education
LDR:02506cam a22003014a 4500 001 770396
003 BmJHUP
005 20130419142203.0
006 m f d u
007 cr un uuauu
008 140117s2011 miua sb 001 0 eng d
010 $z 2011000477
020 $a 9780472026739 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 0472026739 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9780472117659 (hbk.)
020 $a 0472117653 (hbk.)
035 $a MUSE102547
040 $a MdBmJHUP $c MdBmJHUP
041 0 $a eng
043 $a n-us---
050 0 0 $a LB2825 $b .S45 2011
082 0 0 $a 379.73 $2 22
100 1 $a Shelly, Bryan. $3 953590
245 1 0 $a Money, mandates, and local control in American public education $h [electronic resource] / $c Bryan Shelly.
260 $a Ann Arbor : $b University of Michigan Press, $c 2011. $e (Baltimore, Md. : $f Project MUSE, $g 2013)
300 $a 1 online resource (viii, 200 p.) : $b ill.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a "'This book is outstanding. . . . No one has delved into the issue of school financing with such depth, data and thoughtful analysis. It issimply the best in the field.' Susan B. Neuman, University of MichiganPointing to the disparities between wealthy and impoverished school districts in areas where revenue depends primarily upon local taxes, reformers repeatedly call for the centralization of school funding.Their proposals meet resistance from citizens, elected officials, and school administrators who fear the loss of local autonomy.Bryan Shelly finds, however, that local autonomy hasalready been compromised by federal and state governments, which exercise a tremendous amount of control over public education despite their small contribution to a school systems funding. This disproportionate relationship between funding and control allows state and federal officials to pass education policy yet excuses them from supplying adequate funding for new programs. The resulting unfunded and underfunded mandates and regulations, Shelly insists, are the true cause of the loss of community control over public education. Hedemonstrates the effects of the most infamous of underfunded federal mandates, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), and explores why schools implemented it despite its unpopularity and out-of-pocket costs. Shellys findings hold significant implications for school finance reform, NCLB, and the future of intergovernmental relations."-- $c Provided by publisher.
588 $a Description based on print version record.
650 7 $a EDUCATION / Educational Policy & Reform / General $2 bisacsh $3 834709
650 7 $a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / Social Policy $2 bisacsh $3 836545
650 0 $a Educational change $z United States. $3 566493
650 0 $a Educational equalization $z United States. $3 564191
650 0 $a Education and state $z United States. $3 569875
650 0 $a Educational accountability $z United States. $3 556607
650 0 $a Education $z United States $x Finance. $3 931519
710 2 $a Project Muse. $3 943849
856 4 0 $z Full text available: $u http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472026739/