國立虎尾科技大學 |

A defense of Hume on miracles

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A defense of Hume on miracles/ Robert J. Fogelin.
Author:	Fogelin, Robert J.
Published:	Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press, : ©2003.,
Description:	1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
Subject:	Miracles. -
Online resource:	http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj
ISBN:	9781400825776 (electronic bk.)

A defense of Hume on miracles
Fogelin, Robert J.

A defense of Hume on miracles[electronic resource] /Robert J. Fogelin. - Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,©2003. - 1 online resource (xii, 101 p.). - Princeton monographs in philosophy. - Princeton monographs in philosophy..

Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.

The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.

"Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.

ISBN: 9781400825776 (electronic bk.)Subjects--Personal Names:

559414
Hume, David,
1711-1776.Subjects--Topical Terms:

576467
Miracles.

LC Class. No.: B1499.M5 / F64 2010

Dewey Class. No.: 212

A defense of Hume on miracles
LDR:02611cam a2200325Ia 4500 001 793918
003 OCoLC
005 20141031020534.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 150316s2003 nju ob 001 0 eng d
020 $a 9781400825776 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 1400825776 (electronic bk.)
020 $z 0691114307 (alk. paper)
020 $z 9780691114309 (alk. paper)
020 $z 0691122431 (pbk.)
020 $z 9780691122434 (pbk.)
035 $a (OCoLC)650305519
035 $a ocn650305519
040 $a N $b eng $e pn $c N $d EBLCP $d OCLCQ $d JSTOR $d COO $d OCLCQ $d OCLCF $d OCLCQ
050 4 $a B1499.M5 $b F64 2010
082 0 4 $a 212 $2 22
100 1 $a Fogelin, Robert J. $3 575573
245 1 2 $a A defense of Hume on miracles $h [electronic resource] / $c Robert J. Fogelin.
260 $a Princeton, N.J. : $b Princeton University Press, $c ©2003.
300 $a 1 online resource (xii, 101 p.).
490 1 $a Princeton monographs in philosophy
504 $a Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96) and index.
505 0 $a The structure of Hume's argument -- Two recent critics -- The place of "Of Miracles" in Hume's philosophy.
520 1 $a "Since its publication in the mid-eighteenth century, Hume's discussion of miracles has been the target of severe and often ill-tempered attacks. In this book, one of our leading historians of philosophy offers a systematic response to these attacks." "Arguing that these criticisms have - from the very start - rested on misreadings, Robert Fogelin begins by providing a narrative of the way Hume's argument actually unfolds. What Hume's critics (and even some of his defenders) have failed to see is that Hume's primary argument depends on fixing the appropriate standards of evaluating testimony presented on behalf of a miracle. Given the definition of a miracle, Hume quite resonably argues that the standards for evaluating such testimony must be extremely high. Hume then argues that as a matter of fact, no testimony on behalf of a religious miracle has even come close to meeting the appropriate standards for acceptance. Fogelin illustrates that Hume's critics have consistently misunderstood the structure of this argument - and have saddled Hume with perfectly awful arguments not found in the text. He responds first to some early critics of Hume's argument and then to two recent critics, David Johnson and John Earman. Fogelin's goal, however, is not to "bash the bashers," but rather to show that Hume's treatment of miracles has a coherence, depth, and power that makes it still the best work on the subject."--Jacket.
588 0 $a Print version record.
600 1 0 $a Hume, David, $d 1711-1776. $3 559414
650 0 $a Miracles. $3 576467
830 0 $a Princeton monographs in philosophy. $3 814905
856 4 0 $u http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7sccj