國立虎尾科技大學 |

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims/ by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
其他作者:	Gethmann, C.F.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Interdisciplinary research. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
ISBN:	9783319114002 (electronic bk.)

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims[electronic resource] /by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.]. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ethics of science and technology assessment,v.431860-4803 ;. - Ethics of science and technology assessment ;v.43..

Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.

Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.

ISBN: 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

592978
Interdisciplinary research.

LC Class. No.: Q180.55.I48

Dewey Class. No.: 001.4

Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
LDR:02215nam a2200325 a 4500 001 834665
003 DE-He213
005 20150617143921.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160421s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319113999 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-11400-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q180.55.I48
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 001.4 $2 23
090 $a Q180.55.I48 $b I61 2015
245 0 0 $a Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims $h [electronic resource] / $c by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
260 $a Cham : $c 2015. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a xvi, 195 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Ethics of science and technology assessment, $x 1860-4803 ; $v v.43
505 0 $a Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520 $a Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650 0 $a Interdisciplinary research. $3 592978
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a R & D/Technology Policy. $3 669186
650 2 4 $a Knowledge - Discourse. $3 1063331
700 1 $a Gethmann, C.F. $3 1063329
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Ethics of science and technology assessment ; $v v.43. $3 1063330
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
950 $a Engineering (Springer-11647)