國立虎尾科技大學 |

The argumentative turn in policy analysis = reasoning about uncertainty /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The argumentative turn in policy analysis/ edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn.
其他題名:	reasoning about uncertainty /
其他作者:	Hansson, Sven Ove.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
面頁冊數:	xii, 353 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Policy sciences. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3
ISBN:	9783319305493

The argumentative turn in policy analysis = reasoning about uncertainty /
The argumentative turn in policy analysisreasoning about uncertainty /[electronic resource] :edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - xii, 353 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Logic, argumentation & reasoning,v.102214-9120 ;. - Logic, argumentation & reasoning ;v.2..

This book describes argumentative tools and strategies that can be used to guide policy decisions under conditions of great uncertainty. Contributing authors explore methods from philosophical analysis and in particular argumentation analysis, showing how it can be used to systematize discussions about policy issues involving great uncertainty. The first part of the work explores how to deal in a systematic way with decision-making when there may be plural perspectives on the decision problem, along with unknown consequences of what we do. Readers will see how argumentation tools can be used for prioritizing among uncertain dangers, for determining how decisions should be framed, for choosing a suitable time frame for a decision, and for systematically choosing among different decision options. Case studies are presented in the second part of the book, showing argumentation in practice in the areas of climate geoengineering, water governance, synthetic biology, nuclear waste, and financial markets. In one example, argumentation analysis is applied to proposals to solve the climate problem with various technological manipulations of the natural climate system, such as massive dispersion of reflective aerosols into the stratosphere. Even after a thorough investigation of such a proposal, doubt remains as to whether all the potential risks have been identified. In such discussions, conventional risk analysis does not have much to contribute since it presupposes that the risks have been identified, whereas the argumentative approach to uncertainty management can be used to systematize discussions.

ISBN: 9783319305493

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

567116
Policy sciences.

LC Class. No.: H97 / .A74 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 320.6

The argumentative turn in policy analysis = reasoning about uncertainty /
LDR:02657nam a2200313 a 4500 001 864631
003 DE-He213
005 20161102113334.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170720s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319305493 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319305479 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-30549-3
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a H97 $b .A74 2016
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 320.6 $2 23
090 $a H97 $b .A694 2016
245 0 4 $a The argumentative turn in policy analysis $h [electronic resource] : $b reasoning about uncertainty / $c edited by Sven Ove Hansson, Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn.
260 $a Cham : $c 2016. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a xii, 353 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Logic, argumentation & reasoning, $x 2214-9120 ; $v v.10
520 $a This book describes argumentative tools and strategies that can be used to guide policy decisions under conditions of great uncertainty. Contributing authors explore methods from philosophical analysis and in particular argumentation analysis, showing how it can be used to systematize discussions about policy issues involving great uncertainty. The first part of the work explores how to deal in a systematic way with decision-making when there may be plural perspectives on the decision problem, along with unknown consequences of what we do. Readers will see how argumentation tools can be used for prioritizing among uncertain dangers, for determining how decisions should be framed, for choosing a suitable time frame for a decision, and for systematically choosing among different decision options. Case studies are presented in the second part of the book, showing argumentation in practice in the areas of climate geoengineering, water governance, synthetic biology, nuclear waste, and financial markets. In one example, argumentation analysis is applied to proposals to solve the climate problem with various technological manipulations of the natural climate system, such as massive dispersion of reflective aerosols into the stratosphere. Even after a thorough investigation of such a proposal, doubt remains as to whether all the potential risks have been identified. In such discussions, conventional risk analysis does not have much to contribute since it presupposes that the risks have been identified, whereas the argumentative approach to uncertainty management can be used to systematize discussions.
650 0 $a Policy sciences. $3 567116
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a Social Policy. $3 669212
650 2 4 $a Game Theory, Economics, Social and Behav. Sciences. $3 669497
650 2 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
700 1 $a Hansson, Sven Ove. $3 1023253
700 1 $a Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude. $3 1109662
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Logic, argumentation & reasoning ; $v v.2. $3 1022382
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30549-3
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)