國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rational lawmaking under review = legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Rational lawmaking under review/ edited by Klaus Messerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana.
Reminder of title:	legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
other author:	Messerschmidt, Klaus.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2016.,
Description:	viii, 412 p. :ill., digital ; : 25 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Natural law. -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8
ISBN:	9783319332178

Rational lawmaking under review = legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
Rational lawmaking under reviewlegisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court /[electronic resource] :edited by Klaus Messerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2016. - viii, 412 p. :ill., digital ;25 cm. - Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation,v.32213-2813 ;. - Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation ;v.1..

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court's approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers' duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on 'legisprudence under review', this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.

ISBN: 9783319332178

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

571842
Natural law.

LC Class. No.: K415 / .R38 2016

Dewey Class. No.: 340.112

Rational lawmaking under review = legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court /
LDR:03110nam a2200325 a 4500 001 865858
003 DE-He213
005 20160726104752.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170720s2016 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319332178 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319332154 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-33217-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K415 $b .R38 2016
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW079000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 340.112 $2 23
090 $a K415 $b .R236 2016
245 0 0 $a Rational lawmaking under review $h [electronic resource] : $b legisprudence according to the German Federal Constitutional Court / $c edited by Klaus Messerschmidt, A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana.
260 $a Cham : $c 2016. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a viii, 412 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 25 cm.
490 1 $a Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation, $x 2213-2813 ; $v v.3
520 $a This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court's approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers' duty to legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on 'legisprudence under review', this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.
650 0 $a Natural law. $3 571842
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 883676
650 2 4 $a Political Theory. $3 890169
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 671683
650 2 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 671565
700 1 $a Messerschmidt, Klaus. $3 1111664
700 1 $a Oliver-Lalana, A. Daniel. $3 1077175
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Legisprudence library, studies on the theory and practice of legislation ; $v v.1. $3 1077176
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33217-8
950 $a Law and Criminology (Springer-41177)