Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and...
~
SpringerLink (Online service)
Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /
Record Type:
Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Philosophy of cancer/ by Marta Bertolaso.
Reminder of title:
a dynamic and relational view /
Author:
Bertolaso, Marta.
Published:
Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands : : 2016.,
Description:
xv, 190 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
Subject:
Cancer - Philosophy. -
Online resource:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
ISBN:
9789402408652
Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /
Bertolaso, Marta.
Philosophy of cancer
a dynamic and relational view /[electronic resource] :by Marta Bertolaso. - Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands :2016. - xv, 190 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences,v.182211-1948 ;. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ;v.4..
1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.
ISBN: 9789402408652
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
1113155
Cancer
--Philosophy.
LC Class. No.: RC261
Dewey Class. No.: 616
Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /
LDR
:03336nam a2200337 a 4500
001
866746
003
DE-He213
005
20170213141207.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
170720s2016 ne s 0 eng d
020
$a
9789402408652
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9789402408638
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-94-024-0865-2
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
RC261
072
7
$a
HP
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
PHI021000
$2
bisacsh
072
7
$a
SCI086000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
616
$2
23
090
$a
RC261
$b
.B546 2016
100
1
$a
Bertolaso, Marta.
$3
1113154
245
1 0
$a
Philosophy of cancer
$h
[electronic resource] :
$b
a dynamic and relational view /
$c
by Marta Bertolaso.
260
$a
Dordrecht :
$c
2016.
$b
Springer Netherlands :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
300
$a
xv, 190 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences,
$x
2211-1948 ;
$v
v.18
505
0
$a
1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
520
$a
Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.
650
0
$a
Cancer
$x
Philosophy.
$3
1113155
650
0
$a
Medicine
$x
Philosophy.
$3
635864
650
0
$a
Health
$x
Philosophy.
$3
1108427
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
559771
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Biology.
$3
671674
650
2 4
$a
Cancer Research.
$3
668358
650
2 4
$a
Cell Biology.
$3
593889
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Medicine.
$3
671737
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ;
$v
v.4.
$3
1020349
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
950
$a
Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login