語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Understanding and investigating resp...
~
Hubley, Anita M.
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research/ edited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley.
其他作者:
Zumbo, Bruno D.
出版者:
Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2017.,
面頁冊數:
xiii, 370 p. :ill., digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Research - Evaluation. -
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
ISBN:
9783319561295
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
[electronic resource] /edited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2017. - xiii, 370 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Social indicators research series,v.691387-6570 ;. - Social indicators research series ;v.34..
This volume addresses an urgent need across multiple disciplines to broaden our understanding and use of response processes evidence of test validity. It builds on the themes and findings of the volume Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Zumbo & Chan, 2014), with a focus on measurement validity evidence based on response processes. Approximately 1000 studies are published each year examining the validity of inferences made from tests and measures in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. The widely accepted Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999, 2014) present five sources of evidence for validity: content-related, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences of testing. Many studies focus on internal structure and relationships with other variables sources of evidence, which have a long history in validation research, known methodologies, and numerous exemplars in the literature. Far less is understood by test users and researchers conducting validation work about how to think about and apply new and emerging sources of validity evidence. This groundbreaking volume is the first to present conceptual models of response processes, methodological issues that arise in gathering response processes evidence, as well as applications and exemplars for providing response processes evidence in validation work.
ISBN: 9783319561295
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
661102
Research
--Evaluation.
LC Class. No.: Q180.55.E9 / U53 2017
Dewey Class. No.: 001.4
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
LDR
:02463nam a2200313 a 4500
001
885729
003
DE-He213
005
20170524101812.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
180530s2017 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319561295
$q
(electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319561288
$q
(paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-56129-5
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
Q180.55.E9
$b
U53 2017
072
7
$a
JHBC
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
SOC019000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
001.4
$2
23
090
$a
Q180.55.E9
$b
U55 2017
245
0 0
$a
Understanding and investigating response processes in validation research
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
edited by Bruno D. Zumbo, Anita M. Hubley.
260
$a
Cham :
$c
2017.
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
300
$a
xiii, 370 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Social indicators research series,
$x
1387-6570 ;
$v
v.69
520
$a
This volume addresses an urgent need across multiple disciplines to broaden our understanding and use of response processes evidence of test validity. It builds on the themes and findings of the volume Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences (Zumbo & Chan, 2014), with a focus on measurement validity evidence based on response processes. Approximately 1000 studies are published each year examining the validity of inferences made from tests and measures in the social, behavioural, and health sciences. The widely accepted Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (1999, 2014) present five sources of evidence for validity: content-related, response processes, internal structure, relationships with other variables, and consequences of testing. Many studies focus on internal structure and relationships with other variables sources of evidence, which have a long history in validation research, known methodologies, and numerous exemplars in the literature. Far less is understood by test users and researchers conducting validation work about how to think about and apply new and emerging sources of validity evidence. This groundbreaking volume is the first to present conceptual models of response processes, methodological issues that arise in gathering response processes evidence, as well as applications and exemplars for providing response processes evidence in validation work.
650
0
$a
Research
$x
Evaluation.
$3
661102
650
0
$a
Scholarly publishing
$x
Research.
$3
1143105
650
1 4
$a
Social Sciences.
$3
655031
650
2 4
$a
Methodology of the Social Sciences.
$3
669263
650
2 4
$a
Psychological Methods/Evaluation.
$3
677588
650
2 4
$a
Statistics for Social Science, Behavorial Science, Education, Public Policy, and Law.
$3
670129
650
2 4
$a
Assessment, Testing and Evaluation.
$3
671650
650
2 4
$a
Quality of Life Research.
$3
671860
700
1
$a
Zumbo, Bruno D.
$3
1143103
700
1
$a
Hubley, Anita M.
$3
1143104
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
593884
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
Social indicators research series ;
$v
v.34.
$3
882099
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56129-5
950
$a
Social Sciences (Springer-41176)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入