國立虎尾科技大學 |

Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States : = Making the Case for Particularized Trust.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States :/
其他題名:	Making the Case for Particularized Trust.
作者:	Ford, Nicole M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (240 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355544961

Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States : = Making the Case for Particularized Trust.
Ford, Nicole M.

Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States :Making the Case for Particularized Trust. - 1 online resource (240 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

While the literature on democracy and its relationship to trust provides little consensus regarding the role of trust, researchers have emphasized the importance of generalized trust over particularized in relation to democracy. This research marks a departure from this consensus, and exposes the neglected role of personal relationships in fostering successful democracy.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355544961Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States : = Making the Case for Particularized Trust.
LDR:04507ntm a2200409Ki 4500 001 908890
005 20180416072033.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355544961
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10640283
035 $a (MiAaPQ)usf:14399
035 $a AAI10640283
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Ford, Nicole M. $3 1179267
245 1 0 $a Measuring Trust in Post-Communist States : $b Making the Case for Particularized Trust.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (240 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Darrell Slider.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of South Florida $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a While the literature on democracy and its relationship to trust provides little consensus regarding the role of trust, researchers have emphasized the importance of generalized trust over particularized in relation to democracy. This research marks a departure from this consensus, and exposes the neglected role of personal relationships in fostering successful democracy.
520 $a One of the key measurements of democracy in a country is social trust. There are three forms of trust: generalized, particularized and institutional. Previously, the measurement of social trust focused on the importance of generalized trust, that is, trust in those we do not know (Putnam, 1993; Fukuyama, 1995, et. al). Generalized trust is marked as having the greatest benefits for democracy. Those who are generalized trusters have the will to bridge across ethnicities and join civic groups in larger numbers. Institutional trust is society's trust in its institutions. Countries ranking high on institutional trust are also believed to have positive democratic outcomes. By contrast, particularized trust is often dismissed because it is seen as highly atomizing and, therefore, incapable of making bridges to ethnic others resulting in a bankruptcy of democratic values. Thus, the combination of institutional and generalized trust has been the main crux of measurement and understanding in relation to a country's ability to democratize.
520 $a The problem with this approach is two fold: first, it assumes the unidimensionality of trust and ultimately resigns a country of trusters to one category or the other with often negative impacts. The reality is, we are not solely one truster or the other: we are a combination of each form of trust. Secondly, this approach is Western in focus and does not account for the differentiation within cultures and is therefore unable to truly account for trust in a society. Nor does it account for new forms of trust and civil society in the new digital age. Recently, some questions about the legitimacy of this approach have surfaced and new methods have been employed to ascertain the true nature of social trust, however these methods have also fallen short (Gibson 2001; Bhary, et. al. 2005). Because trust is one measure used to determine the amount of democracy in a nation or the ability for it, accurate description is vital.
520 $a Here, the author will take a new approach and focus on the importance of the often overlooked particularized trust, as well as control for the importance of institutionalized trust. Using Khodyakov's (2007) research on trust and the Soviet case as the launching pad, the author will empirically examine trust in the former Soviet Union today. Using the most recent World Values Survey data, a new trust variable will be constructed that will be better able to capture the true, dynamic nature of trust. Placing this new trust variable in a Bayesian hierarchical linear model which will control for country level variables, it will be revealed that particularized trust can and does have positive impacts on support for democracy, debunking current notions to the contrary.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a International relations. $3 554886
650 4 $a Social research. $3 1179269
650 4 $a East European studies. $3 1179149
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0437
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Government and International Affairs. $3 1179268
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10640283 $z click for full text (PQDT)