國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Art Education of Recklessness : = Thinking Scholarship through the Essay.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Art Education of Recklessness :/
其他題名:	Thinking Scholarship through the Essay.
作者:	Morrow, Stephen Mark.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (210 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Film studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369839470

The Art Education of Recklessness : = Thinking Scholarship through the Essay.
Morrow, Stephen Mark.

The Art Education of Recklessness :Thinking Scholarship through the Essay. - 1 online resource (210 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This document has been (for me, writing) and is (for you, reading) a journey. It started with a passing remark in Gilles Deleuze's 1981 book Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. That remark concerned the cliche. The psychic cliches within us all. The greatest accomplishment of the mind is thinking, which according to Deleuze means clawing through and beyond the cliche. But how? I found in my research that higher education art schools (like the higher education English departments in which I had for years taught) claim to teach thinking, sometimes written as "critical thinking;" in addition to all the necessary skills of artmaking. For this dissertation, I set off on a journey to understand what thinking is, finding that Deleuze's study of the dogmatic image of thought and its challenger, the new image of thought---a study he calls noo-ology---to be quite useful in understanding the history of the cliche and originality, and for understanding a problematic within the part of art education that purports to use Deleuzian concepts toward original thinking/artmaking. This document is both about original contributions to any field and is my original contribution to the field. A critique and a proposal.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369839470Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179264
Film studies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Art Education of Recklessness : = Thinking Scholarship through the Essay.
LDR:02627ntm a2200409Ki 4500 001 909321
005 20180426101949.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369839470
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10610214
035 $a (MiAaPQ)OhioLINK:osu1492288407200045
035 $a AAI10610214
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Morrow, Stephen Mark. $3 1180037
245 1 4 $a The Art Education of Recklessness : $b Thinking Scholarship through the Essay.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (210 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: John Richardson.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c The Ohio State University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This document has been (for me, writing) and is (for you, reading) a journey. It started with a passing remark in Gilles Deleuze's 1981 book Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. That remark concerned the cliche. The psychic cliches within us all. The greatest accomplishment of the mind is thinking, which according to Deleuze means clawing through and beyond the cliche. But how? I found in my research that higher education art schools (like the higher education English departments in which I had for years taught) claim to teach thinking, sometimes written as "critical thinking;" in addition to all the necessary skills of artmaking. For this dissertation, I set off on a journey to understand what thinking is, finding that Deleuze's study of the dogmatic image of thought and its challenger, the new image of thought---a study he calls noo-ology---to be quite useful in understanding the history of the cliche and originality, and for understanding a problematic within the part of art education that purports to use Deleuzian concepts toward original thinking/artmaking. This document is both about original contributions to any field and is my original contribution to the field. A critique and a proposal.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 1179264
650 4 $a Art education. $3 1179362
650 4 $a Art history. $3 1180038
650 4 $a Literature. $3 557269
650 4 $a Art criticism. $3 576960
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 1148497
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 1148703
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0273
690 $a 0377
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0365
690 $a 0998
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The Ohio State University. $b Arts Administration, Education and Policy. $3 1179576
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610214 $z click for full text (PQDT)