國立虎尾科技大學 |

Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize : = Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize :/
其他題名:	Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education.
作者:	Sandomierski, David.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (483 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355532890

Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize : = Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education.
Sandomierski, David.

Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize :Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education. - 1 online resource (483 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (S.J.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines the attitudes, pedagogical practices, and teaching materials of Canadian contract law professors to better understand the relationship between theory and practice in legal education. Professors express a widespread aspiration to translate theory into practice -- to incorporate theoretical and critical perspectives as a means of producing "better lawyers." However, an analysis of the substantive theoretical attitudes about law reveals that this aspiration is imperfectly realized.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355532890Subjects--Topical Terms:

671705
Law.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize : = Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education.
LDR:03995ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 909344
005 20180426101949.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355532890
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10635255
035 $a (MiAaPQ)toronto:16399
035 $a AAI10635255
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Sandomierski, David. $3 1180080
245 1 0 $a Canadian Contract Law Teaching and the Failure to Operationalize : $b Theory & Practice, Realism & Formalism, and Aspiration & Reality in Contemporary Legal Education.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (483 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jennifer Nedelsky.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.) $c University of Toronto (Canada) $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines the attitudes, pedagogical practices, and teaching materials of Canadian contract law professors to better understand the relationship between theory and practice in legal education. Professors express a widespread aspiration to translate theory into practice -- to incorporate theoretical and critical perspectives as a means of producing "better lawyers." However, an analysis of the substantive theoretical attitudes about law reveals that this aspiration is imperfectly realized.
520 $a When professors describe their beliefs about law, they overwhelmingly express strong commitments to realist and critical ideas, drawn largely from American legal thought, that emphasize law's contingency and indeterminacy, and that construe considerations of policy, context, and politics as central to an understanding of law. However, the attitudes about law reflected in key manifestations of "practice" reveal an apparently contradictory set of commitments. Professors describe and conceive of legal reasoning, which can be considered a foundational practice shared by legal professionals, in a way that foregrounds formalist attitudes of law. These conceptions treat judicial reasoning seriously, privilege the importance of doctrine, and emphasize the determination of relevance with reference to an internally coherent set of rules -- all of which effectively marginalizes considerations of policy, politics, and context. Moreover, the way professors teach, how they formulate their learning objectives, the decisions they make about substance, and the materials they use all put into practice these formalist ideas, rather than the realist and critical attitudes to which professors are purportedly committed. A similar tension arises as between critical introductory statements in Canadian contract law casebooks and the casebooks' more conventional presentation of substance, as viewed through the remedies chapters.
520 $a These observations imply that Canadian legal thought may be characterized by theoretical eclecticism co-existing with methodological homogeneity, a failure to operationalize theoretical commitments. Moreover, the dynamics reveal a complex interplay between structure and agency in legal education in which professors participate affirmatively in reproducing the structures that condition them. This complex interplay partially accounts for the tenacity of conventional categories, concepts, and pedagogical formulae, and is a crucial factor to understand in the pursuit of any transformative vision for legal education.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 1148703
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Law. $3 1180081
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10635255 $z click for full text (PQDT)