國立虎尾科技大學 |

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures./
作者:	Fleischer, Michael.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (101 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-11B(E).
標題:	Personality psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339922690

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
Fleischer, Michael.

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures. - 1 online resource (101 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

The goal of this study was to identify the best indices for detecting inattentive respondents. This was accomplished by collecting data from respondents who were attentive and inattentive. Five different methods for detecting inattention were compared to determine which of these methods were the most effective. The indices used for detecting inattention were: instructional items, nonsensical items, Fleischer type items, total time, and psychometric consistency. These were classified into two types item based indices and non-item based indices. It was hypothesized and found that Fleischer items were viewed as less awed or out of place when compared to nonsensical and instructional item types. Additional hypotheses tested the effectiveness of each the indices and supported the hypothesis, in finding the Fleischer type and total time to be the best identifiers of inattentive respondents. The final hypothesis did not find support that removing inattentive respondents would yield only better reliabilities. The results were mixed and the interpretation of this and the other findings results are discussed in detail in the following paper.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339922690Subjects--Topical Terms:

1180475
Personality psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
LDR:02569ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 909616
005 20180426091041.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339922690
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10133694
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iit:10308
035 $a AAI10133694
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Fleischer, Michael. $3 1180473
245 1 2 $a A comparison of different methods of detecting inattentive responding on self-report personality measures.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (101 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-11(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Scott Morris.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c Illinois Institute of Technology $d 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a The goal of this study was to identify the best indices for detecting inattentive respondents. This was accomplished by collecting data from respondents who were attentive and inattentive. Five different methods for detecting inattention were compared to determine which of these methods were the most effective. The indices used for detecting inattention were: instructional items, nonsensical items, Fleischer type items, total time, and psychometric consistency. These were classified into two types item based indices and non-item based indices. It was hypothesized and found that Fleischer items were viewed as less awed or out of place when compared to nonsensical and instructional item types. Additional hypotheses tested the effectiveness of each the indices and supported the hypothesis, in finding the Fleischer type and total time to be the best identifiers of inattentive respondents. The final hypothesis did not find support that removing inattentive respondents would yield only better reliabilities. The results were mixed and the interpretation of this and the other findings results are discussed in detail in the following paper.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 1180475
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 1179418
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 1180476
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Illinois Institute of Technology. $b Psychology. $3 1180474
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-11B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10133694 $z click for full text (PQDT)