語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Guidelines for interpretive intervie...
~
The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial./
作者:
Garrett, Amanda L.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (156 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International77-12B(E).
標題:
Health sciences. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781339985657
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
Garrett, Amanda L.
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
- 1 online resource (156 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Includes bibliographical references
Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781339985657Subjects--Topical Terms:
1179212
Health sciences.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
LDR
:02817ntm a2200349Ki 4500
001
909631
005
20180426091041.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781339985657
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10143331
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)unl:12507
035
$a
AAI10143331
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Garrett, Amanda L.
$3
1180501
245
1 0
$a
Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
264
0
$c
2016
300
$a
1 online resource (156 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Advisers: Susan M. Swearer; Wayne A. Babchuk.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)
$c
The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
$d
2016.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Health sciences.
$3
1179212
650
4
$a
Educational psychology.
$3
555103
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0566
690
$a
0525
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
$b
Educational Psychology.
$3
1180502
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
77-12B(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143331
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入