國立虎尾科技大學 |

Language: English

Back to Search results for [ subject:"Mixed methods research." ]

Guidelines for interpretive intervie...

The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial./
Author:	Garrett, Amanda L.
Description:	1 online resource (156 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-12B(E).
Subject:	Health sciences. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339985657

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
Garrett, Amanda L.

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial. - 1 online resource (156 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339985657Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179212
Health sciences.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
LDR:02817ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 909631
005 20180426091041.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339985657
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10143331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unl:12507
035 $a AAI10143331
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Garrett, Amanda L. $3 1180501
245 1 0 $a Guidelines for interpretive interview fidelity in mixed methods research within the context of a randomized controlled trial.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (156 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Susan M. Swearer; Wayne A. Babchuk.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c The University of Nebraska - Lincoln $d 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Interviews fascinate and capture individuals' attention. Researchers value the data they glean from interviews, while participants enjoy being asked to share their voices and opinions. Some of the most complex, stringent research designs are now being revised to include interviews, such as randomized controlled trials. But, how do we know that the interviews that are conducted are valid? We need to know more about how interviews are developed and delivered within the context of intervention research. Therefore, the aim of this methodological dissertation is to create a set of recommendations for interpretive interviews in a mixed methods randomized controlled trial. This dissertation research is part of a larger NIH-funded longitudinal research project on exercise adherence. Through qualitative analysis, dialectical pluralism of research paradigms, and literature on treatment fidelity and validity, the interview fidelity process emerged. Findings indicated five interview fidelity ideals: (1) research contributions, (2) interviewer-participant association, (3) participant accommodation, (4) process and procedures, and (5) data management dimensions. Implications for various research audiences are discussed. Outcomes will assist researchers in processing interviews to encourage and increase validity within the context of intervention trial mixed methods studies and the broader base of all mixed methods studies utilizing interviews.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 1179212
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Educational Psychology. $3 1180502
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-12B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10143331 $z click for full text (PQDT)

based on 0 review(s)

Multimedia

Reviews

Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers

Export

pickup library