國立虎尾科技大學 |

What's the Draw : = Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What's the Draw :/
其他題名:	Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
作者:	Osinski, Brianna.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (87 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-01(E).
標題:	Conservation biology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355266047

What's the Draw : = Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
Osinski, Brianna.

What's the Draw :Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation. - 1 online resource (87 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.

Thesis (M.S.)

Includes bibliographical references

Creating cartoon caricatures of animals is a common, yet rarely tested, tactic for increasing wildlife conservation support. Indiana adults were surveyed to investigate if cartoons of non-charismatic wildlife (i.e., fanshell mussels (Cyprogenia stegaria), eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis), and northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis )) elicited more positive attitudes and behavioral intentions than photographs. Additionally, Indiana wildlife management professionals (WMPs) were interviewed about the use of cartoons for conservation. The cartoon's effects differed between species, attitude type ("Likeability" and "Worth"), and behavioral intentions. Compared to photograph scores, the cartoon "Likeability" scores were less positive for mussels, more positive for hellbenders, and not significantly different for bats. Depiction had no significant impact on "Worth" or behavioral intentions. However, both attitudes predicted significantly more positive behavioral intentions. WMPs were open to creating cartoons of non-charismatic species for conservation if the cartoon was accurate, connected with a broad audience, and had a clear message. These data illustrate the potential of cartoons as effective tools in non-charismatic species conservation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355266047Subjects--Topical Terms:

579656
Conservation biology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

What's the Draw : = Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
LDR:02657ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 910001
005 20180511093033.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355266047
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10607652
035 $a (MiAaPQ)purdue:21743
035 $a AAI10607652
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Osinski, Brianna. $3 1181053
245 1 0 $a What's the Draw : $b Illustrating the Impacts of Cartoons Versus Photographs on Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions for Wildlife Conservation.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (87 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
500 $a Advisers: Rod Williams; Linda Prokopy.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.) $c Purdue University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Creating cartoon caricatures of animals is a common, yet rarely tested, tactic for increasing wildlife conservation support. Indiana adults were surveyed to investigate if cartoons of non-charismatic wildlife (i.e., fanshell mussels (Cyprogenia stegaria), eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis), and northern long-eared bats (Myotis septentrionalis )) elicited more positive attitudes and behavioral intentions than photographs. Additionally, Indiana wildlife management professionals (WMPs) were interviewed about the use of cartoons for conservation. The cartoon's effects differed between species, attitude type ("Likeability" and "Worth"), and behavioral intentions. Compared to photograph scores, the cartoon "Likeability" scores were less positive for mussels, more positive for hellbenders, and not significantly different for bats. Depiction had no significant impact on "Worth" or behavioral intentions. However, both attitudes predicted significantly more positive behavioral intentions. WMPs were open to creating cartoons of non-charismatic species for conservation if the cartoon was accurate, connected with a broad audience, and had a clear message. These data illustrate the potential of cartoons as effective tools in non-charismatic species conservation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Conservation biology. $3 579656
650 4 $a Social research. $3 1179269
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 557931
650 4 $a Wildlife conservation. $3 654486
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0338
690 $a 0284
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Forestry and Natural Resources. $3 1181054
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-01(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607652 $z click for full text (PQDT)