國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement : = Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement :/
其他題名:	Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection.
作者:	Shalwani, Amirali Sikandar.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (110 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-01(E).
標題:	Civil engineering. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355230406

A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement : = Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection.
Shalwani, Amirali Sikandar.

A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement :Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection. - 1 online resource (110 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.

Thesis (M.S.)

Includes bibliographical references

In 1972, the Brooks Act established Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) at the federal level, requiring the U.S. Federal Government to procure architectural and engineering (A/E) consultants based upon their experience and capability rather than cost. Yet at the state, municipal, and local levels, and as well as in the private sector, best value procurement (BV) of A/E services has become prevalent as owners have utilized price evaluations with increasing regularity. A/E professionals have widely viewed this as a trend that carries threatening implications for their profession. In instances where owners insist on evaluating price, professional associations in the A/E community have responded by establishing guidelines for how price should be treated to ensure an effective, fair, and transparent selection process. The two most widespread recommendations are that (1) owners should limit the weight of pricing such that it does not dominate the selection outcome, and (2) a two-envelope system should be used to ensure the evaluation process is not unduly biased towards lowest price. Yet little research has investigated the application of these guidelines within the industry. This paper aims to address this gap by analyzing the characteristics of selected bidders from a dataset of 122 publically-procured A/E projects across North America, where the owners' evaluation process followed the guidelines of limited price weighting and a two-envelope system. Results showed that half the time, the consultant selected within the best value (BV) procurement system was the lowest bid. In the cases where the lowest bid was selected, results showed that the consultant was nearly always ranked within the top three qualifications scores among all consultants. In a quarter of the projects, the lowest bidder also had the highest qualifications. The range of owner evaluation scores for each competing consultant were also analyzed in order to identify which evaluation criteria achieved the greatest differentiation among consultants. Results indicated that cost submissions, schedule proposals, and interviews achieved greater differentiation than technical proposals, past performance or related experience criteria. Lastly, interrelationship of evaluation criteria showed that, no direct relationship existed between cost and other qualifications criteria. The results of this study can help owners in terms of how to optimize the inclusion and weighting of their evaluation criteria. Implications for A/E professionals include recommendations for how to strategize proposal plans to emphasize evaluation criteria that achieve greater differentiation in order to stand out from their competition. Furthermore, the approach of analyzing the evaluation scores for all bidders is novel, and can help researchers in future utilize similar approach.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355230406Subjects--Topical Terms:

561339
Civil engineering.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement : = Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection.
LDR:04193ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 910546
005 20180517123957.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355230406
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10617706
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ku:15556
035 $a AAI10617706
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Shalwani, Amirali Sikandar. $3 1181888
245 1 2 $a A Quantitative Analysis of Architectural and Engineering Procurement : $b Effects of Cost Inclusion on Procurement Outcomes Compared to Qualifications-Based Selection.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (110 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-01.
500 $a Adviser: Brian Lines.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.) $c University of Kansas $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In 1972, the Brooks Act established Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS) at the federal level, requiring the U.S. Federal Government to procure architectural and engineering (A/E) consultants based upon their experience and capability rather than cost. Yet at the state, municipal, and local levels, and as well as in the private sector, best value procurement (BV) of A/E services has become prevalent as owners have utilized price evaluations with increasing regularity. A/E professionals have widely viewed this as a trend that carries threatening implications for their profession. In instances where owners insist on evaluating price, professional associations in the A/E community have responded by establishing guidelines for how price should be treated to ensure an effective, fair, and transparent selection process. The two most widespread recommendations are that (1) owners should limit the weight of pricing such that it does not dominate the selection outcome, and (2) a two-envelope system should be used to ensure the evaluation process is not unduly biased towards lowest price. Yet little research has investigated the application of these guidelines within the industry. This paper aims to address this gap by analyzing the characteristics of selected bidders from a dataset of 122 publically-procured A/E projects across North America, where the owners' evaluation process followed the guidelines of limited price weighting and a two-envelope system. Results showed that half the time, the consultant selected within the best value (BV) procurement system was the lowest bid. In the cases where the lowest bid was selected, results showed that the consultant was nearly always ranked within the top three qualifications scores among all consultants. In a quarter of the projects, the lowest bidder also had the highest qualifications. The range of owner evaluation scores for each competing consultant were also analyzed in order to identify which evaluation criteria achieved the greatest differentiation among consultants. Results indicated that cost submissions, schedule proposals, and interviews achieved greater differentiation than technical proposals, past performance or related experience criteria. Lastly, interrelationship of evaluation criteria showed that, no direct relationship existed between cost and other qualifications criteria. The results of this study can help owners in terms of how to optimize the inclusion and weighting of their evaluation criteria. Implications for A/E professionals include recommendations for how to strategize proposal plans to emphasize evaluation criteria that achieve greater differentiation in order to stand out from their competition. Furthermore, the approach of analyzing the evaluation scores for all bidders is novel, and can help researchers in future utilize similar approach.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Civil engineering. $3 561339
650 4 $a Architectural engineering. $3 1180400
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0462
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering. $3 1181689
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-01(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10617706 $z click for full text (PQDT)