國立虎尾科技大學 |

Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets./
作者:	Okioga, Irene Teshamulwa.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (229 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03B(E).
標題:	Energy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355469011

Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets.
Okioga, Irene Teshamulwa.

Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets. - 1 online resource (229 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This study establishes a decision making procedure using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a U.S. national renewable portfolio standard, and proposes technology-specific targets for renewable electricity generation for the country. The study prioritizes renewable energy alternatives based on a multi-perspective view: from the public, policy makers, and investors' points-of-view, and uses multiple criteria for ranking the alternatives to generate a unified prioritization scheme. During this process, it considers a 'quadruple bottom-line' approach (4P), i.e. reflecting technical "progress", social "people", economic 'profits", and environmental "planet" factors.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355469011Subjects--Topical Terms:

784773
Energy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets.
LDR:03315ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 910592
005 20180517123957.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355469011
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10641679
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uncc:11547
035 $a AAI10641679
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Okioga, Irene Teshamulwa. $3 1181958
245 1 0 $a Decision Analysis and Policy Formulation for Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Targets.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (229 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Yesim A. Sireli.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c The University of North Carolina at Charlotte $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study establishes a decision making procedure using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for a U.S. national renewable portfolio standard, and proposes technology-specific targets for renewable electricity generation for the country. The study prioritizes renewable energy alternatives based on a multi-perspective view: from the public, policy makers, and investors' points-of-view, and uses multiple criteria for ranking the alternatives to generate a unified prioritization scheme. During this process, it considers a 'quadruple bottom-line' approach (4P), i.e. reflecting technical "progress", social "people", economic 'profits", and environmental "planet" factors.
520 $a The AHP results indicated that electricity generation from solar PV ranked highest, and biomass energy ranked lowest. A "Benefits/Cost Incentives/Mandates" (BCIM) model was developed to identify where mandates are needed, and where incentives would instead be required to bring down costs for technologies that have potential for profitable deployment. The BCIM model balances the development of less mature renewable energy technologies, without the potential for rising near-term electricity rates for consumers. It also ensures that recommended policies do not lead to growth of just one type of technology---the "highest-benefit, least-cost" technology. The model indicated that mandates would be suited for solar PV, and incentives generally for geothermal and concentrated solar power. Development for biomass energy, as a "low-cost, low-benefits" alternative was recommended at a local rather than national level, mainly due to its low resource potential values. Further, biomass energy generated from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) had the least resource potential compared to other biomass sources. The research developed methodologies and recommendations for biogas electricity targets at WWTPs, to take advantage of the waste-to-energy opportunities.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Energy. $3 784773
650 4 $a Environmental engineering. $3 557376
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Alternative Energy. $3 845381
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0775
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0363
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. $b Infrastructure & Environmental Systems. $3 1181959
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10641679 $z click for full text (PQDT)