國立虎尾科技大學 |

Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State./
作者:	Hutler, Brian Jeffrey.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (148 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355627367

Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State.
Hutler, Brian Jeffrey.

Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State. - 1 online resource (148 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Religious freedom is often listed among the core freedoms that characterize the liberal state---along with freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom of the person. But it may seem that what is valuable about religion, from a liberal point of view, would be sufficiently protected by these other core freedoms. Does religious freedom have a special role to play in a liberal state?

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355627367Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State.
LDR:03681ntm a2200397Ki 4500 001 911000
005 20180517120326.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355627367
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10744937
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucla:16548
035 $a AAI10744937
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Hutler, Brian Jeffrey. $3 1182575
245 1 0 $a Cooperation, Religious Freedom, and the Liberal State.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (148 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Barbara Herman; Seana Shiffrin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of California, Los Angeles $d 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Religious freedom is often listed among the core freedoms that characterize the liberal state---along with freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom of the person. But it may seem that what is valuable about religion, from a liberal point of view, would be sufficiently protected by these other core freedoms. Does religious freedom have a special role to play in a liberal state?
520 $a Traditionally, liberal theorists have thought that religious freedom required maintaining separation between the state and religion. But problems arise when separation is applied strictly to every type of religion-state interaction, without attention to the underlying values at stake. This dissertation defends a conception of religious freedom that makes room for cooperation and compromise, with the aim of creating mutually beneficial relationships between religion and the state. Separation is an important component of this picture, but not its guiding principle.
520 $a This dissertation discusses two areas in which strict adherence to religion-state separation may lead to problematic outcomes. First, strict adherence to separation lends support to an all-or- nothing approach to religious accommodation. But compromise can often be more valuable for both religious persons and the state, especially when the meaning or purpose of the religious activity is consistent with the purpose of the conflicting law. In such cases, compromise may generate creative solutions to conflicts and may promote mutual understanding and respect between religious persons and their fellow citizens. This compromise-based approach to accommodation is limited, however, by the principle that accommodation should not be used as a form of political protest.
520 $a Second, strict adherence to separation supports protecting the autonomy of religious institutions to oversee their internal own affairs. But the state must also protect the rights and interests of the members of religious institutions. As such, the state must ensure that religious institutions are voluntarily associations, whose members have both a right and a genuine opportunity to exit the association. As one example, the state should generally not enforce religious arbitration agreements against members of religious institutions, even when they have voluntarily agreed to them.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Religion. $3 555020
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0318
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Philosophy. $3 1182576
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10744937 $z click for full text (PQDT)