國立虎尾科技大學 |

Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications./
作者:	Ford, Cheryl.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (92 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-08B(E).
標題:	Public health. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369484601

Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications.
Ford, Cheryl.

Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications. - 1 online resource (92 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.H.)

Includes bibliographical references

Over the past 30 years, public health Practitioners worldwide have increasingly relied on Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) as a tool for informing decision makers of the potential health impacts of proposed policies, programs, and planning decisions. Adoption of the HIA is significantly less common in the United States than in international settings, with wider recognition occurring over the last decade. Many frameworks and procedures exist for conducting HIAs that could be adopted from international and domestic settings. In 2009, the United States adopted its first set of HIA practice standards through a consensus process that to date remains voluntary and unregulated. The absence of HIA national guidelines, amidst limited alternative methods for predicting the health effects of policy decisions, has resulted in wide variation in HIA practice across the United States. Such variations have resulted in decision makers questioning the consistency, accuracy, and validity of HIA findings and recommendations. Despite conformity challenges in United States HIA practice, little is known about Practitioners' views, on factors that promoted or hindered the influence on use of HIAs in non-health decision processes. The current general qualitative inquiry study presents United States HIA practitioner's experiences and perspectives regarding their roles as key health informants providing evidence-based information to non-health decision makers. The researcher used grounded theory (GT) methodology to understand the concepts most salient to key experts who conduct HIAs. The researcher used both purposive and snowball sampling techniques to recruit Practitioners with knowledge and experience in conducting HIAs in the United States, and conducted one-to-one semi-structured interviews with 12 HIA Practitioners representing public, private, and local health organizations to elicit personal views and lived experiences. These data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify and categorize themes within the data, as well as to construct theories from the data showing commonalties, relationships, and overarching patterns between and within the thematic categories. The results indicated a need for understanding practitioner's perspectives in United States HIA practice. These results suggest that the views of HIA Practitioners are essential to improving acceptance, variability, and the future direction of HIA practice in the United States.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369484601Subjects--Topical Terms:

560998
Public health.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications.
LDR:03801ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911038
005 20180517121918.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369484601
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10252717
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:19176
035 $a AAI10252717
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Ford, Cheryl. $3 1182637
245 1 0 $a Perceptions of health impact assessments in influencing, policy decisions through health communications.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (92 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Mary-Katherine Smith.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.H.) $c Capella University $d 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Over the past 30 years, public health Practitioners worldwide have increasingly relied on Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) as a tool for informing decision makers of the potential health impacts of proposed policies, programs, and planning decisions. Adoption of the HIA is significantly less common in the United States than in international settings, with wider recognition occurring over the last decade. Many frameworks and procedures exist for conducting HIAs that could be adopted from international and domestic settings. In 2009, the United States adopted its first set of HIA practice standards through a consensus process that to date remains voluntary and unregulated. The absence of HIA national guidelines, amidst limited alternative methods for predicting the health effects of policy decisions, has resulted in wide variation in HIA practice across the United States. Such variations have resulted in decision makers questioning the consistency, accuracy, and validity of HIA findings and recommendations. Despite conformity challenges in United States HIA practice, little is known about Practitioners' views, on factors that promoted or hindered the influence on use of HIAs in non-health decision processes. The current general qualitative inquiry study presents United States HIA practitioner's experiences and perspectives regarding their roles as key health informants providing evidence-based information to non-health decision makers. The researcher used grounded theory (GT) methodology to understand the concepts most salient to key experts who conduct HIAs. The researcher used both purposive and snowball sampling techniques to recruit Practitioners with knowledge and experience in conducting HIAs in the United States, and conducted one-to-one semi-structured interviews with 12 HIA Practitioners representing public, private, and local health organizations to elicit personal views and lived experiences. These data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify and categorize themes within the data, as well as to construct theories from the data showing commonalties, relationships, and overarching patterns between and within the thematic categories. The results indicated a need for understanding practitioner's perspectives in United States HIA practice. These results suggest that the views of HIA Practitioners are essential to improving acceptance, variability, and the future direction of HIA practice in the United States.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public health. $3 560998
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Nursing and Health Sciences. $3 1182638
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-08B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252717 $z click for full text (PQDT)