國立虎尾科技大學 |

Essays on Banking and Finance.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Essays on Banking and Finance./
作者:	Alnahedh, Saad.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (157 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-02A(E).
標題:	Finance. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355232332

Essays on Banking and Finance.
Alnahedh, Saad.

Essays on Banking and Finance. - 1 online resource (157 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Using a sample of 178 publicly traded Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) in the period between 1994 and 2014, the first chapter provides evidence on the relation between a bank's equity capital ratio and the cost of capital. To address endogeneity between a bank's equity capital ratio and risk of balance sheet assets, we use an instrumental variable (IV) approach, as well as a triple differences (DDD) approach. The IV strategy exploits time-series and cross-sectional exogenous variation in statutory state income taxes levied on banks to instrument for the endogenous book equity capital ratio. The DDD approach examines treated banks, defined as having had a tax increase or decrease shock, against entropy balanced sample of control banks operating in states that did not experience tax shocks during the event window. When states increase statutory state tax rates, BHCs respond by decreasing their book equity capital ratio (increasing leverage) relative to peer out-of-state BHCs. We argue this causes the subsequent decrease in a bank's cost of capital. We find that a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 92 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. We also find that a 10 percentage point increase in the market equity capital ratio is associated with a 59 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. Restricting the analysis to large banks with book assets in excess of $50 billion, we find that a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 23 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. Even though an increase in the equity capital ratio is associated with a private cost to the banks, the effects on bank lending is positive. We find that a 1 percentage point increase in the book (market) equity ratio is associated with a 1.69 (1.21) percentage point increase in bank-level new lending growth. Given the social and economic welfare costs of excessive risk taking by banks through leverage, the results in this paper indicate that raising equity capital requirements is not as costly banks claim.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355232332Subjects--Topical Terms:

559073
Finance.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Essays on Banking and Finance.
LDR:04866ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 911284
005 20180529081902.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355232332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10618236
035 $a (MiAaPQ)colorado:15102
035 $a AAI10618236
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Alnahedh, Saad. $3 1182992
245 1 0 $a Essays on Banking and Finance.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (157 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Sanjai Bhagat.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of Colorado at Boulder $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Using a sample of 178 publicly traded Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) in the period between 1994 and 2014, the first chapter provides evidence on the relation between a bank's equity capital ratio and the cost of capital. To address endogeneity between a bank's equity capital ratio and risk of balance sheet assets, we use an instrumental variable (IV) approach, as well as a triple differences (DDD) approach. The IV strategy exploits time-series and cross-sectional exogenous variation in statutory state income taxes levied on banks to instrument for the endogenous book equity capital ratio. The DDD approach examines treated banks, defined as having had a tax increase or decrease shock, against entropy balanced sample of control banks operating in states that did not experience tax shocks during the event window. When states increase statutory state tax rates, BHCs respond by decreasing their book equity capital ratio (increasing leverage) relative to peer out-of-state BHCs. We argue this causes the subsequent decrease in a bank's cost of capital. We find that a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 92 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. We also find that a 10 percentage point increase in the market equity capital ratio is associated with a 59 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. Restricting the analysis to large banks with book assets in excess of $50 billion, we find that a 10 percentage point increase in the book equity capital ratio is associated with a 23 basis points increase in the bank's cost of capital. Even though an increase in the equity capital ratio is associated with a private cost to the banks, the effects on bank lending is positive. We find that a 1 percentage point increase in the book (market) equity ratio is associated with a 1.69 (1.21) percentage point increase in bank-level new lending growth. Given the social and economic welfare costs of excessive risk taking by banks through leverage, the results in this paper indicate that raising equity capital requirements is not as costly banks claim.
520 $a The second chapter examines the impact of a recent regulatory reform. Implosion of the Money Market Fund (MMF) industry in 2008 has raised alarms about MMF risk-taking; inevitably drawing the attention of financial regulators. Regulations were passed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in July 2014 to increase MMF disclosures, lower incentives to take risks, and reduce the probability of future investor runs on the funds. The new regulations allowed MMFs to impose liquidity gates and redemption fees, and required institutional prime MMFs to adopt a floating (mark-to-market) net asset value (NAV), starting October 2016. Using novel data compiled from algorithmic text-analysis of security-level MMF portfolio holdings, as reported to the SEC, this paper examines the impact of these reforms. Using a difference-in-differences analysis, I find that institutional prime funds responded to this regulation by significantly increasing risk of their portfolios, while simultaneously increasing holdings of opaque securities. I also find that opaque holdings is associated with significantly higher fund yields compared non-opaque asset class holdings. Large bank affiliated MMFs hold the riskiest portfolios. This evidence suggests that the MMF reform of October 2016 has not been effective in curbing MMF risk-taking behavior; importantly, MMFs still pose a systemic risk to the economy given large banks' significant exposure to them.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Finance. $3 559073
650 4 $a Banking. $2 bicssc $3 810653
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0508
690 $a 0770
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Boulder. $b Business. $3 845594
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-02A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10618236 $z click for full text (PQDT)