國立虎尾科技大學 |

Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' : = Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' :/
其他題名:	Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
作者:	Fugo, Justin I.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (249 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355588392

Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' : = Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
Fugo, Justin I.

Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' :Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference. - 1 online resource (249 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation adopts a 'social criticism' model in order to analyze racism in our contemporary world---particularly the United States. This analysis offers a detailed account of racism as rooted in social structural processes, and prioritizes oppression and domination as the chief wrongs resulting from racism. To do so, said analysis highlights norms, ideals, policies, and actions, that are often assumed to be 'race neutral' (e.g., impartiality, merit, 'natural rights', and autonomy), and the role they play in the production of racial injustice. More specifically, it exposes how these norms function to undermine human agency by restricting means for self-development and self-determination. As such, the role that inclusive and democratic deliberation can play in combatting racial oppression and domination is developed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355588392Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' : = Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
LDR:03053ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 911458
005 20180529084352.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355588392
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10635997
035 $a (MiAaPQ)temple:13108
035 $a AAI10635997
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Fugo, Justin I. $3 1183285
245 1 0 $a Behind 'The Veil of Race-Neutrality' : $b Sharing Responsibility for Racial Justice and Cultivating Democratic Equality of Difference.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (249 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Espen Hammer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c Temple University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation adopts a 'social criticism' model in order to analyze racism in our contemporary world---particularly the United States. This analysis offers a detailed account of racism as rooted in social structural processes, and prioritizes oppression and domination as the chief wrongs resulting from racism. To do so, said analysis highlights norms, ideals, policies, and actions, that are often assumed to be 'race neutral' (e.g., impartiality, merit, 'natural rights', and autonomy), and the role they play in the production of racial injustice. More specifically, it exposes how these norms function to undermine human agency by restricting means for self-development and self-determination. As such, the role that inclusive and democratic deliberation can play in combatting racial oppression and domination is developed.
520 $a In light of this analysis, a defense of a 'concrete morality' which prioritizes the fight against oppression and domination, is made against an 'abstract morality' that adheres to 'ideally just' principles regardless of the injustice that results from doing so. Moreover, this project develops a 'shared responsibility model' for racial injustice, articulating varying degrees and kinds of responsibility we have for correcting it. It concludes by offering 'democratic equality of difference' as a normative ideal for cultivating racial justice. Generally, said ideal aims to: create basic conditions for the self-development and collective self-determination of all; cultivate a universally inclusive and ongoing process of democratic deliberation for solving collective problems; and attend to difference when deliberating about matters of justice.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Ethnic studies. $2 bicssc $3 809601
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 551705
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0631
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Temple University. $b Philosophy. $3 1183286
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10635997 $z click for full text (PQDT)