國立虎尾科技大學 |

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences./
作者:	Ni, Chaoqun.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (269 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
標題:	Information science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339674247

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
Ni, Chaoqun.

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences. - 1 online resource (269 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Doctoral mentoring plays an important role in the professional development and career trajectories of doctoral students, although little research exists quantifying the relationship between the scholarly practice and performance of doctoral advisees and their advisors. This dissertation proposes a set of analyses that explore the relationship between doctoral advisees and advisors in terms of their scholarly practice and performance---including publication, collaboration and citation patterns---based on massive and heterogeneous data sources. Economics, Political Science and Sociology are selected for the purpose of illustrating these relationships in the social sciences. Results show that advisees are more likely to learn from their advisors by imitating those aspects of scientometric profiles that are directly transferable, such as reference and collaboration patterns. For aspects that rely more on individual endeavor of advisees and where they exert less control, advisees are less likely to inherit from their advisors. Although disciplines investigated in this study show the general pattern mentioned above, the strength to which advisors and advisees are related in each aspect of scientometric profiles varies significantly among Economics, Political Science and Sociology. This study is unique in proposing a framework for analyzing the relationship between the scientometric profiles of advisors and advisees at a large scale and should shed light on future research regarding doctoral mentoring and intellectual capital reproduction of disciplines.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339674247Subjects--Topical Terms:

561178
Information science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
LDR:02950ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 911484
005 20180529094434.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339674247
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10103882
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:14058
035 $a AAI10103882
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Ni, Chaoqun. $3 1183333
245 1 0 $a Are scientometric profiles hereditary? Analyzing scholarly practices of doctoral advisors and advisees in the social sciences.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (269 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Cassidy R. Sugimoto.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c Indiana University $d 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Doctoral mentoring plays an important role in the professional development and career trajectories of doctoral students, although little research exists quantifying the relationship between the scholarly practice and performance of doctoral advisees and their advisors. This dissertation proposes a set of analyses that explore the relationship between doctoral advisees and advisors in terms of their scholarly practice and performance---including publication, collaboration and citation patterns---based on massive and heterogeneous data sources. Economics, Political Science and Sociology are selected for the purpose of illustrating these relationships in the social sciences. Results show that advisees are more likely to learn from their advisors by imitating those aspects of scientometric profiles that are directly transferable, such as reference and collaboration patterns. For aspects that rely more on individual endeavor of advisees and where they exert less control, advisees are less likely to inherit from their advisors. Although disciplines investigated in this study show the general pattern mentioned above, the strength to which advisors and advisees are related in each aspect of scientometric profiles varies significantly among Economics, Political Science and Sociology. This study is unique in proposing a framework for analyzing the relationship between the scientometric profiles of advisors and advisees at a large scale and should shed light on future research regarding doctoral mentoring and intellectual capital reproduction of disciplines.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
650 4 $a Library science. $3 561163
650 4 $a Social research. $3 1179269
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0723
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Information Science. $3 1183334
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10103882 $z click for full text (PQDT)