國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation./
作者:	De Leonardis, Stephen Edward.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (85 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04B(E).
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355400465

The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation.
De Leonardis, Stephen Edward.

The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation. - 1 online resource (85 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Since September 11, 2001, the United States increased its security. Many preventative, controversial measures were implemented to ensure that future attacks would not happen again. One of these controversial measures was the use of psychologists in government interrogations. This prompted an amendment to the psychologists' ethical code that did not allow psychologists to participate in a violation of human rights. Some psychologists view participating in death penalty cases violations of human rights. This researcher examined the understanding of the general public and how they interpreted what a human rights violation is concerning a psychologist's involvement in a death penalty case. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for hypotheses one and two, and a three-way analysis of variance was performed for hypotheses three and four. The results of these tests did not provide support to the hypotheses. There were interactions that took place with who hired the psychologist, level of expertise, and the perceived level of a human rights violation. Sex had an interaction concerning bias. These findings may help psychologists understand how the general public interprets human rights violations. This research was aimed to give more understanding to the ethical code revisions and how the general public interprets a human rights violation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355400465Subjects--Topical Terms:

555998
Psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation.
LDR:02712ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911602
005 20180529094436.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355400465
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10637859
035 $a (MiAaPQ)alliant:13010
035 $a AAI10637859
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a De Leonardis, Stephen Edward. $3 1183534
245 1 4 $a The Public's Perception of Psychologists' Involvement in the Death Penalty as an Ethical or a Human Rights Violation.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (85 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Debra Glaser.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.) $c Alliant International University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Since September 11, 2001, the United States increased its security. Many preventative, controversial measures were implemented to ensure that future attacks would not happen again. One of these controversial measures was the use of psychologists in government interrogations. This prompted an amendment to the psychologists' ethical code that did not allow psychologists to participate in a violation of human rights. Some psychologists view participating in death penalty cases violations of human rights. This researcher examined the understanding of the general public and how they interpreted what a human rights violation is concerning a psychologist's involvement in a death penalty case. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for hypotheses one and two, and a three-way analysis of variance was performed for hypotheses three and four. The results of these tests did not provide support to the hypotheses. There were interactions that took place with who hired the psychologist, level of expertise, and the perceived level of a human rights violation. Sex had an interaction concerning bias. These findings may help psychologists understand how the general public interprets human rights violations. This research was aimed to give more understanding to the ethical code revisions and how the general public interprets a human rights violation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b Clinical Forensic Psychology. $3 1183535
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637859 $z click for full text (PQDT)