國立虎尾科技大學 |

Legitimacy's Stutter : = The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Legitimacy's Stutter :/
其他題名:	The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution.
作者:	Ward, Alan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (412 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355134827

Legitimacy's Stutter : = The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution.
Ward, Alan.

Legitimacy's Stutter :The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution. - 1 online resource (412 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

There is persistent disagreement over whether or not there is a prima facie moral duty to obey the law. While most contemporary democratic theorists believe that such a duty exists, "philosophical anarchists" argue that such a position would constitute a violation of individual autonomy. In this dissertation, I present and assess a deliberative model of political legitimacy, one that I believe takes seriously the concerns of philosophical anarchists.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355134827Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Legitimacy's Stutter : = The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution.
LDR:03078ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911661
005 20180531091027.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355134827
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264042
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsd:16365
035 $a AAI10264042
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Ward, Alan. $3 1183632
245 1 0 $a Legitimacy's Stutter : $b The Philosophical Anarchist Challenge and Deliberation's Uncertain Solution.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (412 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Tracy B. Strong; Gerry Mackie.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of California, San Diego $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a There is persistent disagreement over whether or not there is a prima facie moral duty to obey the law. While most contemporary democratic theorists believe that such a duty exists, "philosophical anarchists" argue that such a position would constitute a violation of individual autonomy. In this dissertation, I present and assess a deliberative model of political legitimacy, one that I believe takes seriously the concerns of philosophical anarchists.
520 $a This work is divided into two parts. First, I review and update existing arguments in favor of law abidance, finding them lacking. Second, I articulate and examine the hypothesis that we (1) have a natural duty to deliberate, which in turn (2) generates a duty to abide by the results of the deliberative procedures. Drawing on literature pertaining to dignity, deliberation, politeness, and apology, I argue that deliberation is an unpersuasive answer to philosophical anarchists. The deliberative procedures can generate a duty of law abidance only if participants feel as though the process did not violate duties of respect for self and others. In order for this to obtain, the deliberators must perform actions which signal or constitute respect. Yet these concrete actions, while necessary to demonstrate respect, can serve to undermine it as well. It is the prerogative of each earnest deliberator to determine for him or herself whether or not the deliberation is respectful. If it is not, the deliberator is discharged from the political obligation to abide by the results of the (disrespectful) deliberation, although she may nevertheless have moral reasons to obey the law. What's more, others may have good moral reasons to coerce this person into law-abidance.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, San Diego. $b Political Science. $3 1183633
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264042 $z click for full text (PQDT)