語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. ...
~
Robert Morris University.
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter./
作者:
Buckles, Brian K.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (299 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:
Communication. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355132953
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter.
Buckles, Brian K.
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter.
- 1 online resource (299 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (D.Sc.)
Includes bibliographical references
This research examined how members of the U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committees used Twitter to communicate committee activities to their constituents. To address the study's three research questions, a total of 17,756 tweets were collected from a purposeful sample of 30 members of the HASC and SASC during the study period October 1, 2015 to May 26, 2016. A quantitative content analysis was conducted using the individual tweet as the unit of analysis. Twitter content was categorized per coding methods established in previous research which enabled the results of this study to be compared to the results of that previous research. Two metrics, percent of total tweets relating to committee activities and tweets per committee activity were developed for this research. Key research findings conclude: that sample members use Twitter as a one-way communication platform with limited direct communication to constituents; that Twitter is not generally being used to communicate official defense authorization committee duties and responsibilities; that use of Twitter is not increasing transparency; that the HASC exhibits a higher rate of legislative function tweets while the SASC exhibits a higher rate of oversight function tweets; that Republicans exhibited higher tweet rates in both legislative and oversight functions than did Democrats; and that committee chairmen tweet about official committee duties and responsibilities more than committee minority leaders and sub-committee leaders. Additional findings identified four techniques being employed by congressional members to expand political messaging beyond the 140 character limitations of a single tweet, and that Twitter opinion leadership is directly associated with positional leadership within the HASC and SASC.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355132953Subjects--Topical Terms:
556422
Communication.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter.
LDR
:03166ntm a2200385Ki 4500
001
911714
005
20180531091028.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355132953
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10607639
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)rmu:10089
035
$a
AAI10607639
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Buckles, Brian K.
$3
1183719
245
1 0
$a
Keeping Constituents Informed? U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committee Members' Use of Twitter.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (299 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Barbara Levine.
502
$a
Thesis (D.Sc.)
$c
Robert Morris University
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
This research examined how members of the U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committees used Twitter to communicate committee activities to their constituents. To address the study's three research questions, a total of 17,756 tweets were collected from a purposeful sample of 30 members of the HASC and SASC during the study period October 1, 2015 to May 26, 2016. A quantitative content analysis was conducted using the individual tweet as the unit of analysis. Twitter content was categorized per coding methods established in previous research which enabled the results of this study to be compared to the results of that previous research. Two metrics, percent of total tweets relating to committee activities and tweets per committee activity were developed for this research. Key research findings conclude: that sample members use Twitter as a one-way communication platform with limited direct communication to constituents; that Twitter is not generally being used to communicate official defense authorization committee duties and responsibilities; that use of Twitter is not increasing transparency; that the HASC exhibits a higher rate of legislative function tweets while the SASC exhibits a higher rate of oversight function tweets; that Republicans exhibited higher tweet rates in both legislative and oversight functions than did Democrats; and that committee chairmen tweet about official committee duties and responsibilities more than committee minority leaders and sub-committee leaders. Additional findings identified four techniques being employed by congressional members to expand political messaging beyond the 140 character limitations of a single tweet, and that Twitter opinion leadership is directly associated with positional leadership within the HASC and SASC.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Communication.
$3
556422
650
4
$a
Information science.
$3
561178
650
4
$a
Information technology.
$3
559429
650
4
$a
Mass communication.
$3
1179310
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
558774
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0459
690
$a
0723
690
$a
0489
690
$a
0708
690
$a
0615
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Robert Morris University.
$b
Information Systems and Communications.
$3
1181490
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-01A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607639
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入