國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea : = Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea :/
其他題名:	Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
作者:	Rost, Caterina.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (382 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-02A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355356281

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea : = Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
Rost, Caterina.

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea :Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States. - 1 online resource (382 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

The idea of sustainable development underlies a policy regime in Germany but has not provided the basis for similar policy in the United States. Even though polls suggest that there is widespread support for environmental spending in both the US and Germany, only Germany has a well-developed policy regime around sustainable development. In the US, however, the idea as well as the interests and institutions surrounding sustainable development have not been able to capture policymaking at the national level, despite multiple attempts by presidents (specifically Presidents Carter & Clinton). This dissertation is seeking to answer the question, why has sustainable development taken such a different trajectory in US national policymaking than it has in German national policymaking? More broadly speaking, how do ideas gain traction in policymaking? I argue that these two cases allow us to draw several broader lessons about the tractability of ideas. These lessons concern ideational framing and concurrence, the impact of the political system on the strength of the interest opposition, the capabilities and limitations of the institutional structure, as well as the impact of contextual factors. Ultimately, the evidence points to the largest lesson being the importance of the interplay of ideas, interests, institutions, and ideology.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355356281Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea : = Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
LDR:02676ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911732
005 20180531091028.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355356281
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10622169
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:17848
035 $a AAI10622169
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Rost, Caterina. $3 1183746
245 1 4 $a The Divergent Trajectories of an Idea : $b Sustainable Development in Germany and the United States.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (382 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark A. Smith.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of Washington $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The idea of sustainable development underlies a policy regime in Germany but has not provided the basis for similar policy in the United States. Even though polls suggest that there is widespread support for environmental spending in both the US and Germany, only Germany has a well-developed policy regime around sustainable development. In the US, however, the idea as well as the interests and institutions surrounding sustainable development have not been able to capture policymaking at the national level, despite multiple attempts by presidents (specifically Presidents Carter & Clinton). This dissertation is seeking to answer the question, why has sustainable development taken such a different trajectory in US national policymaking than it has in German national policymaking? More broadly speaking, how do ideas gain traction in policymaking? I argue that these two cases allow us to draw several broader lessons about the tractability of ideas. These lessons concern ideational framing and concurrence, the impact of the political system on the strength of the interest opposition, the capabilities and limitations of the institutional structure, as well as the impact of contextual factors. Ultimately, the evidence points to the largest lesson being the importance of the interplay of ideas, interests, institutions, and ideology.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 1009004
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0404
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Political Science. $3 1183668
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-02A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10622169 $z click for full text (PQDT)