國立虎尾科技大學 |

Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing./
作者:	Wampler, Emma K.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (64 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01B(E).
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355124262

Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing.
Wampler, Emma K.

Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing. - 1 online resource (64 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Years of research using electrophysiology to study language processes have yielded important discoveries about language-specific event-related potentials. However, most of these studies examined grand averages and population differences and avoided looking at individual differences. More recently, a few studies have shown that variability exists between individuals in their ERP responses to grammatical errors and that this variability may be related to cognitive and linguistic abilities. The goal of this study was to replicate the variability found previously and to investigate its relationship with measures of memory and cognitive abilities. We tested Ullman's Procedural-Declarative model of language (Ullman 2001, 2004, 2005) by examining the relationship between procedural memory ability and the ERP response. We also investigated the possibility of gender differences in processing grammatical errors. Adult native English speakers read English sentences while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. The relative magnitudes of the N400 and P600 to grammatical errors were compared to calculate a response dominance index (RDI) for each subject. We examined the correlation of the RDI with measures of declarative memory, procedural memory, verbal working memory, and processing speed. We also investigated differences in the RDI between men and women and between those with a first-degree left handed relative (familial sinistrality, or FS+) and those without (FS--). We replicated the finding that individuals vary on their dominant response (P600 vs N400) to grammatical errors. We found no relationship between RDI and any of the predictor variables, but did find a difference between men and women in the size of the N400 effect to syntactic errors. This does not lend evidence to the Declarative-Procedural model of language, which may relate to its strong dependence on data from individuals with language disorder. We suggest that the gender difference indicates that men are more variable in their processing of grammatical anomalies and relate this back to the variation seen across studies of the P600 effect. These results also provide strong support for the feasibility of examining individual differences using ERP data, even in populations previously thought to be homogenous.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355124262Subjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing.
LDR:03599ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911855
005 20180531103648.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355124262
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10598886
035 $a (MiAaPQ)washington:17497
035 $a AAI10598886
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Wampler, Emma K. $3 1183945
245 1 0 $a Individual Differences in Grammatical Error Processing.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (64 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Lee Osterhout.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of Washington $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Years of research using electrophysiology to study language processes have yielded important discoveries about language-specific event-related potentials. However, most of these studies examined grand averages and population differences and avoided looking at individual differences. More recently, a few studies have shown that variability exists between individuals in their ERP responses to grammatical errors and that this variability may be related to cognitive and linguistic abilities. The goal of this study was to replicate the variability found previously and to investigate its relationship with measures of memory and cognitive abilities. We tested Ullman's Procedural-Declarative model of language (Ullman 2001, 2004, 2005) by examining the relationship between procedural memory ability and the ERP response. We also investigated the possibility of gender differences in processing grammatical errors. Adult native English speakers read English sentences while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. The relative magnitudes of the N400 and P600 to grammatical errors were compared to calculate a response dominance index (RDI) for each subject. We examined the correlation of the RDI with measures of declarative memory, procedural memory, verbal working memory, and processing speed. We also investigated differences in the RDI between men and women and between those with a first-degree left handed relative (familial sinistrality, or FS+) and those without (FS--). We replicated the finding that individuals vary on their dominant response (P600 vs N400) to grammatical errors. We found no relationship between RDI and any of the predictor variables, but did find a difference between men and women in the size of the N400 effect to syntactic errors. This does not lend evidence to the Declarative-Procedural model of language, which may relate to its strong dependence on data from individuals with language disorder. We suggest that the gender difference indicates that men are more variable in their processing of grammatical anomalies and relate this back to the variation seen across studies of the P600 effect. These results also provide strong support for the feasibility of examining individual differences using ERP data, even in populations previously thought to be homogenous.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Language. $3 571568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Psychology. $3 1179848
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10598886 $z click for full text (PQDT)