國立虎尾科技大學 |

A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy./
作者:	Richmond, Christopher J.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (137 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-12, Section: B, page: 8410.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780549371366

A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy.
Richmond, Christopher J.

A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy. - 1 online resource (137 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-12, Section: B, page: 8410.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Western Michigan University, 2007.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this study was to compare clients' assessment of two different counseling intake procedures used by clinicians. This study compared a Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) intake intervention with an intake intervention constructed from the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). The SCID-I is one of the most widely used diagnostic interviews and reflects a "gold standard" in formulating accurate diagnoses. The SFBT intake intervention developed for this study stands in stark contrast to the SCID-I and its primary objective, evaluation of the problem. SFBT is a strength-based model that maintains a positive and future-oriented focus. This model is deliberate in its focus on initiating and maintaining discussions of strengths, resources, and solutions as opposed to problems.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780549371366Subjects--Topical Terms:

649607
Clinical psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy.
LDR:03520ntm a2200337K 4500 001 912232
005 20180608102943.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2007 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780549371366
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3293187
035 $a AAI3293187
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Richmond, Christopher J. $3 1184500
245 1 2 $a A study of intake and assessment in solution -focused brief therapy.
264 0 $c 2007
300 $a 1 online resource (137 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-12, Section: B, page: 8410.
500 $a Adviser: Alan Hovestadt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Western Michigan University, 2007.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this study was to compare clients' assessment of two different counseling intake procedures used by clinicians. This study compared a Solution-Focused Brief Therapy (SFBT) intake intervention with an intake intervention constructed from the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). The SCID-I is one of the most widely used diagnostic interviews and reflects a "gold standard" in formulating accurate diagnoses. The SFBT intake intervention developed for this study stands in stark contrast to the SCID-I and its primary objective, evaluation of the problem. SFBT is a strength-based model that maintains a positive and future-oriented focus. This model is deliberate in its focus on initiating and maintaining discussions of strengths, resources, and solutions as opposed to problems.
520 $a Many mental health agencies believe that a comprehensive psychological intake interview or assessment, in which information is gleaned from a broad array of areas is essential in determining the client's appropriateness for counseling and planning a successful course for treatment. However, little attention has been given to the intake interview or assessment, as well as different intake procedures and their impact as experienced by the client.
520 $a Client assessments of the SFBT and the SCID-I intake intervention were examined with regard to counselor attractiveness, expertness, trustworthiness, and total effectiveness; session depth, smoothness, positivity, and arousal; outcome optimism and goal clarity; and client's current level of distress.
520 $a The sample consisted of 30 clients, which included 16 female and 14 male participants. An equal number of participants received the SFBT and SCID-I intake intervention. This study employed a mean comparison design in which participants' outcome scores on the two intakes were assessed. Participants were randomly assigned to either treatment A (SFBT intake) or treatment B (SCID-I intake). A series of t tests was conducted on each of the dependent variables based upon the mean scores from the participants within the SFBT and SCID intake groups. Results revealed no statistically significant differences between the two intake assessments, thus suggesting that the SFBT intake intervention was comparable to the SCID-I intake intervention in regard to the selected outcome variables.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 649607
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Western Michigan University. $3 1184501
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3293187 $z click for full text (PQDT)