國立虎尾科技大學 |

Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses./
作者:	Speicher-Bocija, Jayne Denise.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (179 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: B, page: 3580.
標題:	Clinical psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780599420434

Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses.
Speicher-Bocija, Jayne Denise.

Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses. - 1 online resource (179 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: B, page: 3580.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Akron, 1999.

Includes bibliographical references

Client verbal responses to a counselor utilizing a solution-focused or problem-focused interview protocol were explored as they related to client's self-efficacy scores when controlling for client's locus of control. A sequential analysis revealed the type of interview clients received did affect their verbal responses. Clients receiving a solution-focused interview responded more frequently than expected with reports of change and discussion of plans to change eliciting statements. In both solution-focused and problem-focused interviews therapists' statements requesting problem information resulted in greater than expected client descriptions of problem information. This pattern also held when therapists utilized minimal encouragers and approval statements. The expected relationship between the frequencies of clients' change responses and discussion of plans and their self-efficacy after the interview was not supported. The interview type was not predictive of the self-efficacy score after the interview. Further, locus of control did not interact with interview type to differentially impact self-efficacy. Locus of control did not improve upon the prediction of self-efficacy when included with interview type. Qualitative data obtained from clients after the interview revealed common experiences for clients in either interview type on aspects of therapist support, an opportunity to air concerns and therapist input and assistance.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780599420434Subjects--Topical Terms:

649607
Clinical psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses.
LDR:02619ntm a2200313K 4500 001 912277
005 20180608102944.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s1999 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780599420434
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9940556
035 $a AAI9940556
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Speicher-Bocija, Jayne Denise. $3 1184569
245 1 0 $a Comparison of the effect of solution-focused and problem-focused interviews on clients' immediate verbal responses.
264 0 $c 1999
300 $a 1 online resource (179 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-07, Section: B, page: 3580.
500 $a Adviser: Sandra Perosa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Akron, 1999.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Client verbal responses to a counselor utilizing a solution-focused or problem-focused interview protocol were explored as they related to client's self-efficacy scores when controlling for client's locus of control. A sequential analysis revealed the type of interview clients received did affect their verbal responses. Clients receiving a solution-focused interview responded more frequently than expected with reports of change and discussion of plans to change eliciting statements. In both solution-focused and problem-focused interviews therapists' statements requesting problem information resulted in greater than expected client descriptions of problem information. This pattern also held when therapists utilized minimal encouragers and approval statements. The expected relationship between the frequencies of clients' change responses and discussion of plans and their self-efficacy after the interview was not supported. The interview type was not predictive of the self-efficacy score after the interview. Further, locus of control did not interact with interview type to differentially impact self-efficacy. Locus of control did not improve upon the prediction of self-efficacy when included with interview type. Qualitative data obtained from clients after the interview revealed common experiences for clients in either interview type on aspects of therapist support, an opportunity to air concerns and therapist input and assistance.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 649607
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0459
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Akron. $3 1184570
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9940556 $z click for full text (PQDT)