國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees./
作者:	Washburn, Mark.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (130 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
標題:	Accounting. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355187823

The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees.
Washburn, Mark.

The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees. - 1 online resource (130 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Formed under the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) was charged with providing the interpretive guidance for auditors to use in carrying out their responsibilities under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. Auditing Standard No. 2 (AS2) provided the initial guidance to auditors beginning in 2004. Early research on audit delay and audit fees under these new requirements revealed significant increases in both. Although audit delay and audit fees decreased in subsequent years, they remained much higher than predicted. As a result of the concerns and complaints of the accounting profession and the public firms affected by AS2, the PCAOB rescinded AS2 and replaced it with Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5) in 2007. The primary objective of the new guidance focuses the auditors' attention on the most important matters in the audit of internal controls over financial reporting and eliminating procedures that the Board believes are unnecessary to an effective audit of internal control. Intended to streamline the audit process, the goal of the PCAOB was to reduce audit delay and audit fees. Research in the AS5 era has produced mixed results for both. In this study, I extend the early AS5 research to determine if AS5 has had a significant impact on reducing both audit delay and audit fees. Using multiple regression analysis, I examine audit delay and audit fees from 2007 through 2013 to determine their long-term trend. Data sources include Audit Analytics, Compustat, and CRSP. Based on the literature review, I expect to find a decrease to both audit delay and audit fees over the long-term.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355187823Subjects--Topical Terms:

561166
Accounting.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees.
LDR:02813ntm a2200325K 4500 001 912521
005 20180608112132.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355187823
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264943
035 $a (MiAaPQ)novase:10189
035 $a AAI10264943
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Washburn, Mark. $3 1184922
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Auditing Standard No. 5 on Audit Delay and Audit Fees.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (130 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mary Fischer.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Formed under the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) was charged with providing the interpretive guidance for auditors to use in carrying out their responsibilities under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404. Auditing Standard No. 2 (AS2) provided the initial guidance to auditors beginning in 2004. Early research on audit delay and audit fees under these new requirements revealed significant increases in both. Although audit delay and audit fees decreased in subsequent years, they remained much higher than predicted. As a result of the concerns and complaints of the accounting profession and the public firms affected by AS2, the PCAOB rescinded AS2 and replaced it with Auditing Standard No. 5 (AS5) in 2007. The primary objective of the new guidance focuses the auditors' attention on the most important matters in the audit of internal controls over financial reporting and eliminating procedures that the Board believes are unnecessary to an effective audit of internal control. Intended to streamline the audit process, the goal of the PCAOB was to reduce audit delay and audit fees. Research in the AS5 era has produced mixed results for both. In this study, I extend the early AS5 research to determine if AS5 has had a significant impact on reducing both audit delay and audit fees. Using multiple regression analysis, I examine audit delay and audit fees from 2007 through 2013 to determine their long-term trend. Data sources include Audit Analytics, Compustat, and CRSP. Based on the literature review, I expect to find a decrease to both audit delay and audit fees over the long-term.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Accounting. $3 561166
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0272
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Nova Southeastern University. $b Business Administration. $3 1181194
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264943 $z click for full text (PQDT)