國立虎尾科技大學 |

Perceiving Extraction : = Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Perceiving Extraction :/
其他題名:	Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality.
作者:	Malcolm, Chris.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (249 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
標題:	Environmental studies. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355308174

Perceiving Extraction : = Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality.
Malcolm, Chris.

Perceiving Extraction :Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality. - 1 online resource (249 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation argues that environmental work, from resource extraction projects to environmental assessment, and from Land Art to eco-criticism, privileges harm rhetorically. This means, among other things, that such work carries along with it a sense of past, present, and future destruction. As a result, resource extraction companies, and the settler-colonial State, have a conception of the violence that they create and that they participate in. I show that the conception they have requires an infrastructural framework, one which I read out of environmental assessment and land-management documents. These documents set the visual conditions not just for extraction projects, but for environmental objects in general. The Environmental Humanities have rarely treated the rhetoric of management. But I argue that it not only materially produces their object of study, but also produces the field of visibility in which that object appears and others don't---establishing the criteria for what counts as a claim and what registers as an effect. I suggest that this creates a visual regime which finds a parallel in, for instance, the work of Edward Burtynsky and Timothy Morton. However, while these discourses try to manage the appearance of violence, suggesting that ongoing destruction can't be seen, they can't control it. Via a reading of the Land Art movement, I show how landscape is one place where these conflicts appear. And through Chantal Akerman's documentary film, among others, and an analysis of the colonial dispute at Standing Rock, I construct a contrary visual regime, one which recognizes ongoing non-fungible destruction.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355308174Subjects--Topical Terms:

1180247
Environmental studies.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Perceiving Extraction : = Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality.
LDR:02832ntm a2200337K 4500 001 912674
005 20180608130835.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355308174
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10288731
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uci:14597
035 $a AAI10288731
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Malcolm, Chris. $3 1185147
245 1 0 $a Perceiving Extraction : $b Landscape, Use, and the Conditions of Visuality.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (249 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Rei Terada.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation argues that environmental work, from resource extraction projects to environmental assessment, and from Land Art to eco-criticism, privileges harm rhetorically. This means, among other things, that such work carries along with it a sense of past, present, and future destruction. As a result, resource extraction companies, and the settler-colonial State, have a conception of the violence that they create and that they participate in. I show that the conception they have requires an infrastructural framework, one which I read out of environmental assessment and land-management documents. These documents set the visual conditions not just for extraction projects, but for environmental objects in general. The Environmental Humanities have rarely treated the rhetoric of management. But I argue that it not only materially produces their object of study, but also produces the field of visibility in which that object appears and others don't---establishing the criteria for what counts as a claim and what registers as an effect. I suggest that this creates a visual regime which finds a parallel in, for instance, the work of Edward Burtynsky and Timothy Morton. However, while these discourses try to manage the appearance of violence, suggesting that ongoing destruction can't be seen, they can't control it. Via a reading of the Land Art movement, I show how landscape is one place where these conflicts appear. And through Chantal Akerman's documentary film, among others, and an analysis of the colonial dispute at Standing Rock, I construct a contrary visual regime, one which recognizes ongoing non-fungible destruction.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 1180247
650 4 $a Film studies. $3 1179264
650 4 $a Comparative literature. $3 835159
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0900
690 $a 0295
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $b Comparative Literature - Ph.D.. $3 1185148
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10288731 $z click for full text (PQDT)