國立虎尾科技大學 |

Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence./
作者:	Millar, Jason L.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (228 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369102918

Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence.
Millar, Jason L.

Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence. - 1 online resource (228 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2015.

Includes bibliographical references

Humans have been automating increasingly sophisticated behaviours for some time now. We have machines that lift and move things, that perform complex calculations, and even machines that build other machines. More recently, technological advances have allowed us to automate increasingly sophisticated decision-making processes. We have machines that decide when and how to use lethal force, when and how to perform life-saving medical interventions, and when and how to maneuver cars in chaotic traffic. Clearly, some automated decision-making processes have serious ethical implications---we are now automating ethical decision-making. In this dissertation, I identify and explore a novel set of ethical implications that stem from automating ethical decision-making in emerging and existing technologies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369102918Subjects--Topical Terms:

559771
Philosophy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence.
LDR:03631ntm a2200361K 4500 001 913654
005 20180622095235.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2015 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369102918
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10155206
035 $a AAI10155206
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Millar, Jason L. $3 1186579
245 1 0 $a Technological moral proxies and the ethical limits of automating decision-making in robotics and artificial intelligence.
264 0 $c 2015
300 $a 1 online resource (228 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Sergio Sismondo; Ian Kerr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2015.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Humans have been automating increasingly sophisticated behaviours for some time now. We have machines that lift and move things, that perform complex calculations, and even machines that build other machines. More recently, technological advances have allowed us to automate increasingly sophisticated decision-making processes. We have machines that decide when and how to use lethal force, when and how to perform life-saving medical interventions, and when and how to maneuver cars in chaotic traffic. Clearly, some automated decision-making processes have serious ethical implications---we are now automating ethical decision-making. In this dissertation, I identify and explore a novel set of ethical implications that stem from automating ethical decision-making in emerging and existing technologies.
520 $a I begin the argument by setting up an analogy between moral proxies in healthcare, tasked with making ethical decisions on behalf of those who cannot, and technological moral proxies, those machines (artefacts) to which we delegate ethical decision-making. The technological moral proxy is a useful metaphor. It allows us to import the many established norms surrounding moral proxies in bioethics, to inform the ethics, design and governance of certain machines. As is the case with moral proxies in healthcare, we need norms to help guide the design and governance of machines that are making ethical decisions on behalf of their users. Importantly, I argue that we need a methodology and framework to ensure we aren't subjecting technology users to unacceptable forms of paternalism.
520 $a Having set up the analogy, I situate the discussion within various theories in science and technology studies (STS). STS provides a rich philosophical vocabulary to help ground the particular ethical implications, including implications for designers and engineers, raised by machines that automate ethical decision-making. Thus, STS helps to frame the issues I raise as design and governance issues.
520 $a I then provide a rudimentary taxonomy of delegation to help distinguish between automated decision-making that is ethically permissible, and that which is impermissible. Finally, I combine the various pieces of the argument into a practical "tool" that could be used in design or governance contexts to help guide an ethical analysis of robots that automate ethical decision-making.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 555769
650 4 $a Medical ethics. $3 559096
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0497
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Queen's University (Canada). $3 1148613
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10155206 $z click for full text (PQDT)