國立虎尾科技大學 |

Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams : = A multilevel study.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams :/
其他題名:	A multilevel study.
作者:	Munoz Galvez, Gonzalo Javier.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (123 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: B.
標題:	Occupational psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781321418682

Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams : = A multilevel study.
Munoz Galvez, Gonzalo Javier.

Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams :A multilevel study. - 1 online resource (123 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2014.

Includes bibliographical references

A mental model reflects the structural relationships between concepts within a specified knowledge domain. Measuring the structure of knowledge is important because it offers the possibility of capturing expert knowledge which is often difficult to assess using traditional declarative knowledge measures. The concept of mental model has been extensively studied over the last decades and it is often acknowledged in the training literature as one of the key antecedents of performance in complex tasks, particularly in the context of teams where the construct of shared mental models has received ample attention. Whereas the training literature has established the validity of mental models for predicting individual and team performance using single-level studies, the extant literature has not yet tested the validity of mental models as a multilevel construct. Consequently, the purpose of the present study was to assess the extent to which the relationships between mental models and performance generalizes across individuals and teams, that is to test a homologous multilevel model.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781321418682Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179639
Occupational psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams : = A multilevel study.
LDR:04221ntm a2200361K 4500 001 913759
005 20180622095237.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2014 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781321418682
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3667617
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0803vireo:14208Munoz_Galvez
035 $a AAI3667617
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Munoz Galvez, Gonzalo Javier. $3 1186726
245 1 0 $a Mental models and the acquisition of a complex skill across individuals and teams : $b A multilevel study.
264 0 $c 2014
300 $a 1 online resource (123 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-06(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Winfred Arthur.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2014.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a A mental model reflects the structural relationships between concepts within a specified knowledge domain. Measuring the structure of knowledge is important because it offers the possibility of capturing expert knowledge which is often difficult to assess using traditional declarative knowledge measures. The concept of mental model has been extensively studied over the last decades and it is often acknowledged in the training literature as one of the key antecedents of performance in complex tasks, particularly in the context of teams where the construct of shared mental models has received ample attention. Whereas the training literature has established the validity of mental models for predicting individual and team performance using single-level studies, the extant literature has not yet tested the validity of mental models as a multilevel construct. Consequently, the purpose of the present study was to assess the extent to which the relationships between mental models and performance generalizes across individuals and teams, that is to test a homologous multilevel model.
520 $a Participants in this study completed a dynamic, networked computer-based simulation. Three-person teams operated the simulator collectively (through specialized roles) and as individuals (performing all roles simultaneously) over the course of a 2-day 48-hour-interval protocol. The sample consisted of 243 individuals nested in 81 3-person teams. Consistent with the multilevel nature of the problem under study, multilevel analyses were conducted to test the study hypotheses.
520 $a Consistent with theory and previous research on individual and team cognition, it was hypothesized that stronger relationships between mental models and performance would exist at the individual level compared to the team level. In essence, processes occurring at the team level were expected to attenuate the relationship between mental models and performance compared to the individual level of analysis. Contrary to this expectation, the magnitude of the relationship between mental models and performance was similar across levels of analysis. Additionally, consistent with previous research on the effectiveness of declarative knowledge measures for predicting complex performance, the present results indicated that declarative knowledge was more predictive of individual performance than team performance.
520 $a In addition to performance, an objective measure of behaviors was utilized to further understand of the processes through which mental models translate into effective individual and team performance. It was hypothesized that the relationship between mental models and behaviors would be stronger for individual tasks than team tasks as a function of the additional interaction requirements associated with team tasks. However, contrary to this expectations, mental models and behaviors were more strongly associated at the team level than the individual level.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 1179639
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Texas A&M University. $b Psychology. $3 1185520
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3667617 $z click for full text (PQDT)