國立虎尾科技大學 |

Philosopher kings, then and now : = The political philosophy of IQ.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Philosopher kings, then and now :/
其他題名:	The political philosophy of IQ.
作者:	Smith, Brannon Wilson.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (192 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781321883497

Philosopher kings, then and now : = The political philosophy of IQ.
Smith, Brannon Wilson.

Philosopher kings, then and now :The political philosophy of IQ. - 1 online resource (192 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2015.

Includes bibliographical references

The most fundamental question of political philosophy is "who should rule?" Socrates famously argued in the Republic that philosophers were the most precise guardians of the best city. The question of intelligence is not a theoretical one; it is relevant far beyond the building of cities in speech. The importance we ascribe to measures of intelligence informs a broad range of policy questions and could challenge our democratic processes. This dissertation seeks to understand the relationship of the modern concept of IQ to Western political philosophy by investigating the role of intelligence for Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, and contemporary psychometricians. Whereas intelligence has a moral dimension for the classical philosophers, Machiavelli emphasized the use of prudence in the service of ambition. Contemporary psychometrics presents intelligence as a distinct, amoral property. I argue that Freud and group psychology provide insight into the way democracy could relate to a hypothetical cognitive elite. I further suggest ways in which we could make use of the modern IQ test to improve the quality of our political leadership and make use of an important Platonic theory without abandoning representative democracy as we know it.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781321883497Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Philosopher kings, then and now : = The political philosophy of IQ.
LDR:02427ntm a2200337K 4500 001 913780
005 20180622095237.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2015 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781321883497
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3711879
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umd:16064
035 $a AAI3711879
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Smith, Brannon Wilson. $3 1186761
245 1 0 $a Philosopher kings, then and now : $b The political philosophy of IQ.
264 0 $c 2015
300 $a 1 online resource (192 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: James M. Glass.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2015.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The most fundamental question of political philosophy is "who should rule?" Socrates famously argued in the Republic that philosophers were the most precise guardians of the best city. The question of intelligence is not a theoretical one; it is relevant far beyond the building of cities in speech. The importance we ascribe to measures of intelligence informs a broad range of policy questions and could challenge our democratic processes. This dissertation seeks to understand the relationship of the modern concept of IQ to Western political philosophy by investigating the role of intelligence for Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, and contemporary psychometricians. Whereas intelligence has a moral dimension for the classical philosophers, Machiavelli emphasized the use of prudence in the service of ambition. Contemporary psychometrics presents intelligence as a distinct, amoral property. I argue that Freud and group psychology provide insight into the way democracy could relate to a hypothetical cognitive elite. I further suggest ways in which we could make use of the modern IQ test to improve the quality of our political leadership and make use of an important Platonic theory without abandoning representative democracy as we know it.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Government and Politics. $3 1186762
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3711879 $z click for full text (PQDT)