國立虎尾科技大學 |

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management./
Author:	Baker, Erik Reese.
Description:	1 online resource (139 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.
Subject:	Energy. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355408980

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management.
Baker, Erik Reese.

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management. - 1 online resource (139 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

A repeated-measures, within-subjects design was conducted on 58 participant pilots to assess mean differences on energy management situation awareness response time and response accuracy between a conventional electronic aircraft display, a primary flight display (PFD), and an ecological interface design aircraft display, the OZ concept display. Participants were associated with a small Midwestern aviation university, including student pilots, flight instructors, and faculty with piloting experience. Testing consisted of observing 15 static screenshots of each cockpit display type and then selecting applicable responses from 27 standardized responses for each screen.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355408980Subjects--Topical Terms:

784773
Energy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management.
LDR:03717ntm a2200361K 4500 001 914018
005 20180628100933.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355408980
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10691109
035 $a (MiAaPQ)erau:10397
035 $a AAI10691109
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Baker, Erik Reese. $3 1187083
245 1 0 $a Comparative Analysis of Conventional Electronic and OZ Concept Displays for Aircraft Energy Management.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (139 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Haydee M. Cuevas.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a A repeated-measures, within-subjects design was conducted on 58 participant pilots to assess mean differences on energy management situation awareness response time and response accuracy between a conventional electronic aircraft display, a primary flight display (PFD), and an ecological interface design aircraft display, the OZ concept display. Participants were associated with a small Midwestern aviation university, including student pilots, flight instructors, and faculty with piloting experience. Testing consisted of observing 15 static screenshots of each cockpit display type and then selecting applicable responses from 27 standardized responses for each screen.
520 $a A paired samples t-test was computed comparing accuracy and response time for the two displays. There was no significant difference in means between PFD Response Time and OZ Response Time. On average, mean PFD Accuracy was significantly higher than mean OZ Accuracy (MDiff = 13.17, SDDiff = 20.96), t(57) = 4.78, p < .001, d = 0.63. This finding showed operational potential for the OZ display, since even without first training to proficiency on the previously unseen OZ display, participant performance differences were not operationally remarkable.
520 $a There was no significant correlation between PFD Response Time and PFD Accuracy, but there was a significant correlation between OZ Response Time and OZ Accuracy, r (58) = .353, p < .01. These findings suggest the participant familiarity of the PFD resulted in accuracy scores unrelated to response time, compared to the participants unaccustomed with the OZ display where longer response times manifested in greater understanding of the OZ display.
520 $a PFD Response Time and PFD Accuracy were not correlated with pilot flight hours, which was not expected. It was thought that increased experience would translate into faster and more accurate assessment of the aircraft stimuli. OZ Response Time and OZ Accuracy were also not correlated with pilot flight hours, but this was expected. This was consistent with previous research that observed novice operators performing as well as experienced professional pilots on dynamic flight tasks with the OZ display. A demographic questionnaire and a feedback survey were included in the trial. An equivalent three-quarters majority of participants rated the PFD as "easy" and the OZ as "confusing", yet performance accuracy and response times between the two displays were not operationally different.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Energy. $3 784773
650 4 $a Aerospace engineering. $3 686400
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0538
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. $b Doctoral Studies. $3 1187084
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10691109 $z click for full text (PQDT)