國立虎尾科技大學 |

登入

回首頁

I'm every woman? How identities infl...

ProQuest Information and Learning Co.

I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues./
作者:	Sentementes, Amy Irene.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (48 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339005447

I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues.
Sentementes, Amy Irene.

I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues. - 1 online resource (48 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2015.

Includes bibliographical references

In this paper, I argue that political elites intend the popular women's issue label to serve as an issue frame. I evaluate how individuals, especially women, respond to this frame. I offer an original theoretical framework about how identities, specifically partisan and gender identities, influence conceptions of women's issues, as the potentially distinct definitions of women's issues between Democratic and Republican individuals may serve as the cause for their disparate responses to the women's issue frame. To test my theory, I use a nationally representative public opinion survey that contains questions about individuals' identities and their understanding of women's issues. In this analysis, I find that Republicans and Democrats identify distinct sets of issues as women's issues. I also find that women and Democrats possess a more developed understanding of women's issues than men and Republicans, respectively. These findings suggest that identities limit the success of the women's issue frame.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339005447Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues.
LDR:02148ntm a2200313K 4500 001 914022
005 20180628100934.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2015 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339005447
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1597491
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unc:15611
035 $a AAI1597491
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sentementes, Amy Irene. $3 1187089
245 1 0 $a I'm every woman? How identities influence conceptions of women's issues.
264 0 $c 2015
300 $a 1 online resource (48 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Adviser: Pamela J. Conover.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2015.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In this paper, I argue that political elites intend the popular women's issue label to serve as an issue frame. I evaluate how individuals, especially women, respond to this frame. I offer an original theoretical framework about how identities, specifically partisan and gender identities, influence conceptions of women's issues, as the potentially distinct definitions of women's issues between Democratic and Republican individuals may serve as the cause for their disparate responses to the women's issue frame. To test my theory, I use a nationally representative public opinion survey that contains questions about individuals' identities and their understanding of women's issues. In this analysis, I find that Republicans and Democrats identify distinct sets of issues as women's issues. I also find that women and Democrats possess a more developed understanding of women's issues than men and Republicans, respectively. These findings suggest that identities limit the success of the women's issue frame.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. $b Political Science. $3 1187090
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1597491 $z click for full text (PQDT)

筆 0 讀者評論

多媒體

評論

新增評論分享你的心得

Export

取書館別