國立虎尾科技大學 |

Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users./
作者:	Howard, Charla Lindley.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (245 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
標題:	Biomedical engineering. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355505566

Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users.
Howard, Charla Lindley.

Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users. - 1 online resource (245 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Lower-limb prosthesis users have commonly-recognized deficits in gait and posture control. However, existing methods in balance and mobility analysis fail to provide sufficient sensitivity to detect changes in prosthesis users' postural control and mobility in response to clinical intervention or experimental manipulations and often fail to detect differences between prosthesis users and non-amputee control subjects. This lack of sensitivity limits the ability of clinicians to make informed clinical decisions and presents challenges with insurance reimbursement for comprehensive clinical care and advanced prosthetic devices. These issues have directly impacted clinical care by restricting device options, increasing financial burden on clinics, and limiting support for research and development. This work aims to establish experimental methods and outcome measures that are more sensitive than traditional methods to balance and mobility changes in prosthesis users. Methods and analysis techniques were developed to probe aspects of balance and mobility control that may be specifically impacted by use of a prosthesis and present challenges similar to those experienced in daily life that could improve the detection of balance and mobility changes. Using the framework of cognitive resource allocation and dual-tasking, this work identified unique characteristics of prosthesis users' postural control and developed sensitive measures of gait variability. The results also provide broader insight into dual-task analysis and the motor-cognitive response to demanding conditions. Specifically, this work identified altered motor behavior in prosthesis users and high cognitive demand of using a prosthesis. The residual standard deviation method was developed and demonstrated to be more effective than traditional gait variability measures at detecting the impact of dual-tasking. Additionally, spectral analysis of the center of pressure while standing identified altered somatosensory control in prosthesis users. These findings provide a new understanding of prosthetic use and new, highly sensitive techniques to assess balance and mobility in prosthesis users.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355505566Subjects--Topical Terms:

588770
Biomedical engineering.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users.
LDR:03309ntm a2200313K 4500 001 914382
005 20180703084809.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355505566
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10642768
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17451
035 $a AAI10642768
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Howard, Charla Lindley. $3 1187621
245 1 0 $a Techniques to Assess Balance and Mobility in Lower-Limb Prosthesis Users.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (245 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: James Abbas.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Lower-limb prosthesis users have commonly-recognized deficits in gait and posture control. However, existing methods in balance and mobility analysis fail to provide sufficient sensitivity to detect changes in prosthesis users' postural control and mobility in response to clinical intervention or experimental manipulations and often fail to detect differences between prosthesis users and non-amputee control subjects. This lack of sensitivity limits the ability of clinicians to make informed clinical decisions and presents challenges with insurance reimbursement for comprehensive clinical care and advanced prosthetic devices. These issues have directly impacted clinical care by restricting device options, increasing financial burden on clinics, and limiting support for research and development. This work aims to establish experimental methods and outcome measures that are more sensitive than traditional methods to balance and mobility changes in prosthesis users. Methods and analysis techniques were developed to probe aspects of balance and mobility control that may be specifically impacted by use of a prosthesis and present challenges similar to those experienced in daily life that could improve the detection of balance and mobility changes. Using the framework of cognitive resource allocation and dual-tasking, this work identified unique characteristics of prosthesis users' postural control and developed sensitive measures of gait variability. The results also provide broader insight into dual-task analysis and the motor-cognitive response to demanding conditions. Specifically, this work identified altered motor behavior in prosthesis users and high cognitive demand of using a prosthesis. The residual standard deviation method was developed and demonstrated to be more effective than traditional gait variability measures at detecting the impact of dual-tasking. Additionally, spectral analysis of the center of pressure while standing identified altered somatosensory control in prosthesis users. These findings provide a new understanding of prosthetic use and new, highly sensitive techniques to assess balance and mobility in prosthesis users.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 588770
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0541
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Biomedical Engineering. $3 1187622
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10642768 $z click for full text (PQDT)