國立虎尾科技大學 |

An Evaluation of Design : = Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Evaluation of Design :/
其他題名:	Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
作者:	Haffey, Morgan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (60 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
標題:	Landscape architecture. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355467796

An Evaluation of Design : = Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
Haffey, Morgan.

An Evaluation of Design :Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California. - 1 online resource (60 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Because of the growth in urbanism, professionals in the environmental industry are often tasked with designing strategies to accommodate urban development while minimizing environmental impact (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). Converting the natural landscape into residential or commercial developments can drastically alter its hydrologic characteristics (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). This study compares an existing undeveloped site along the Los Angeles River (scenario 1) with two design scenarios. One design is the city's conceptual plan, referred to as a Mia Lehrer and Associates Design (design scenario 3). The second design incorporates low impact design elements, referred to as the Extended LID Design (design scenario 2). Using these three scenarios and the EPA stormwater calculator, runoff, infiltration, and evaporation will be measured to determine which design is most effective along these three parameters. The Friedman's One Way of Variance Test was applied to the treatments in order to determine which design was most successful concerning stormwater management. The results show that the design with LID controls are significantly greater than the existing conditions (p<0.005).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355467796Subjects--Topical Terms:

555495
Landscape architecture.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

An Evaluation of Design : = Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
LDR:02374ntm a2200325K 4500 001 914411
005 20180712070704.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355467796
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10266580
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.msu:15147
035 $a AAI10266580
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Haffey, Morgan. $3 1187659
245 1 3 $a An Evaluation of Design : $b Low Impact Development vs. Traditional Design on a Site in Los Angeles, California.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (60 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-02.
500 $a Adviser: Patricia Machemer.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Michigan State University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Because of the growth in urbanism, professionals in the environmental industry are often tasked with designing strategies to accommodate urban development while minimizing environmental impact (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). Converting the natural landscape into residential or commercial developments can drastically alter its hydrologic characteristics (Selbig & Bannerman, 2008). This study compares an existing undeveloped site along the Los Angeles River (scenario 1) with two design scenarios. One design is the city's conceptual plan, referred to as a Mia Lehrer and Associates Design (design scenario 3). The second design incorporates low impact design elements, referred to as the Extended LID Design (design scenario 2). Using these three scenarios and the EPA stormwater calculator, runoff, infiltration, and evaporation will be measured to determine which design is most effective along these three parameters. The Friedman's One Way of Variance Test was applied to the treatments in order to determine which design was most successful concerning stormwater management. The results show that the design with LID controls are significantly greater than the existing conditions (p<0.005).
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 555495
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 1178858
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Environmental Design. $3 1187660
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10266580 $z click for full text (PQDT)