國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors./
作者:	Nelson, Kari L.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (135 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
標題:	Higher education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355845570

The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors.
Nelson, Kari L.

The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors. - 1 online resource (135 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Universities are increasingly encouraging their undergraduates to become mentors to others, yet relatively little research has been done to empirically understand the impact of this work on the mentors themselves. Therefore, the overall goals of this work were: (1) To evaluate the types of studies that have been conducted on the impacts of serving as an undergraduate mentor; (2) To examine the methodological rigor of recent studies and make recommendations for improvement; and (3) To asses if serving as an undergraduate mentor impacted the critical thinking of the mentors, using a valid and reliable instrument, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST).

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355845570Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148448
Higher education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors.
LDR:03655ntm a2200373K 4500 001 914799
005 20180724121430.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355845570
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10787303
035 $a (MiAaPQ)unl:12924
035 $a AAI10787303
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Nelson, Kari L. $3 1188155
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Mentoring on Life Science Undergraduate Mentors.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (135 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Julie Thomas; Cory Forbes.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Universities are increasingly encouraging their undergraduates to become mentors to others, yet relatively little research has been done to empirically understand the impact of this work on the mentors themselves. Therefore, the overall goals of this work were: (1) To evaluate the types of studies that have been conducted on the impacts of serving as an undergraduate mentor; (2) To examine the methodological rigor of recent studies and make recommendations for improvement; and (3) To asses if serving as an undergraduate mentor impacted the critical thinking of the mentors, using a valid and reliable instrument, the California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST).
520 $a Upon searching the undergraduate mentoring literature published from 2013 through 2016, remarkably only about 6% (27 out of 454) examined the impact of mentoring on the undergraduate mentors themselves. Of these 27 papers, 7% contained only quantitative data, 22% utilized some degree of mixed methods, and about 71% were purely qualitative, primarily mentor self-reported descriptions of their experience. Therefore, I recommend more mentoring research be conducted that incorporates rigorous methods, including the use of more mixed methods and quantitative data collection, utilizing valid and reliable instruments.
520 $a Subsequently, I used a quantitative instrument, the CCTST, as a pre/post assessment to examine the impact serving as a mentor had on the critical thinking abilities of mentors who were undergraduate life science majors when compared to similar non-mentor, life science majors. Prior to serving as a mentor, the mentors and non-mentors showed no significant difference in critical thinking ability (p = 0.118). However, after mentoring, mentors demonstrated significantly greater overall critical thinking ability than their non-mentor counterparts (p = 0.001). Additionally, in the subscales of analysis, inference, and numeracy, mentors showed significant improvements over non-mentors (p < 0.001 for each), suggesting that mentoring, at least in this specific program for this population, does affect critical thinking ability.
520 $a Overall, the limited research of the impacts of mentoring on undergraduate mentors that is available is encouraging. However, mentoring programs vary widely and more empirical evidence is needed to better understand these impacts and to maximize the benefits for both the mentors and the mentees.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
650 4 $a Science education. $3 1151737
650 4 $a Biology. $3 599573
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0306
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Nebraska - Lincoln. $b Educational Studies. $3 1185290
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10787303 $z click for full text (PQDT)