國立虎尾科技大學 |

A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems./
作者:	Dong, Long Si.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (207 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: B.
標題:	Engineering. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369788273

A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems.
Dong, Long Si.

A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems. - 1 online resource (207 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Methodist University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Systems are becoming more complex while developments of these systems are facing challenges because of reduced funding and development schedules due to the fact that technologies emerge and quickly become obsolete. Cost and schedule overruns are common during defense systems development. However, "do more with less" is a new reality for the U. S. defense industry. As a result, affordability has become the dominant consideration in development of U.S. defense systems. The realization of affordability in major weapon systems development programs may not be at a tipping point; however, the biggest customer of these weapon developers, that is the United States Department of Defense (DoD), will drive affordability through cost reduction and rapid development through firm fixed contracts vehicle. This has become game-changing for the defense industry and will drive affordability from engineering offices and manufacturing floors to tiers' suppliers. For every complex system development program, the cost to design a system is estimated or predicted before the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract is awarded. However, the estimated cost figure is evolving as systems engineering efforts take place throughout the design life cycle. As a result, without understanding the cost figures during the phases of a program, cost overrun is inevitable. For that reason, the need for mandating affordability maturity assessment throughout the acquisition milestones is long overdue. There are numerous processes, tools, best practices, and methodologies implemented by Systems Engineering communities that attempt to improve cost and schedule performances. Until now the capability was lacking for assessing the organizations' ability to meet cost, schedule, and technical requirements. I have validated such a gap and used systems engineering to develop a methodology needed to assess affordability during development. The methodology includes associated models for assessing an organization's ability to develop U.S. defense systems that meets contractual technical requirements within cost and on schedule. The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) method [34], the U.S. Defense Acquisition Strategy, DoDI 5000.02 [72], and the ISO/IEC 15288 standard [27] were used in development of the Affordability Maturity Assessment Methodology (AMAM), considering organization enablers, program management, external risk, and technical performance [13]. This methodology provides a new ground-breaking systems engineering capability for determination of cost and schedule drivers, and the organization's ability to control, to manage, and to achieve contractual requirements leading up to meeting the overall system performance requirements.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369788273Subjects--Topical Terms:

561152
Engineering.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems.
LDR:03992ntm a2200349K 4500 001 915143
005 20180727091510.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369788273
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10276752
035 $a (MiAaPQ)smu:10845
035 $a AAI10276752
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dong, Long Si. $3 1188405
245 1 2 $a A Methodology for Assessing Affordability Maturity of U. S. Defense Systems.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (207 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: B.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Adviser: Jerrell Stracener.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Methodist University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Systems are becoming more complex while developments of these systems are facing challenges because of reduced funding and development schedules due to the fact that technologies emerge and quickly become obsolete. Cost and schedule overruns are common during defense systems development. However, "do more with less" is a new reality for the U. S. defense industry. As a result, affordability has become the dominant consideration in development of U.S. defense systems. The realization of affordability in major weapon systems development programs may not be at a tipping point; however, the biggest customer of these weapon developers, that is the United States Department of Defense (DoD), will drive affordability through cost reduction and rapid development through firm fixed contracts vehicle. This has become game-changing for the defense industry and will drive affordability from engineering offices and manufacturing floors to tiers' suppliers. For every complex system development program, the cost to design a system is estimated or predicted before the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) contract is awarded. However, the estimated cost figure is evolving as systems engineering efforts take place throughout the design life cycle. As a result, without understanding the cost figures during the phases of a program, cost overrun is inevitable. For that reason, the need for mandating affordability maturity assessment throughout the acquisition milestones is long overdue. There are numerous processes, tools, best practices, and methodologies implemented by Systems Engineering communities that attempt to improve cost and schedule performances. Until now the capability was lacking for assessing the organizations' ability to meet cost, schedule, and technical requirements. I have validated such a gap and used systems engineering to develop a methodology needed to assess affordability during development. The methodology includes associated models for assessing an organization's ability to develop U.S. defense systems that meets contractual technical requirements within cost and on schedule. The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) method [34], the U.S. Defense Acquisition Strategy, DoDI 5000.02 [72], and the ISO/IEC 15288 standard [27] were used in development of the Affordability Maturity Assessment Methodology (AMAM), considering organization enablers, program management, external risk, and technical performance [13]. This methodology provides a new ground-breaking systems engineering capability for determination of cost and schedule drivers, and the organization's ability to control, to manage, and to achieve contractual requirements leading up to meeting the overall system performance requirements.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 561152
650 4 $a Management. $3 558618
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 1148479
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Southern Methodist University. $b Engineering Management, Information and Systems. $3 1188406
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10276752 $z click for full text (PQDT)