國立虎尾科技大學 |

Language: English

Back

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monito...

Jackson, Brendan.

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies./
Author:	Jackson, Brendan.
Description:	1 online resource (59 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
Subject:	Recreation. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369504514

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
Jackson, Brendan.

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies. - 1 online resource (59 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

Ranking methodologies for estimating campsite impacts have traditionally been used in addition to (and sometimes in place of) actual measures of impacts. Ranking systems are seen as easier to implement; however, there is concern that these methods may not accurately predict actual measures of impact. Multiple methods of campsite impact monitoring (including both ranking and actual measures) were applied within the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness Area in upstate New York to evaluate how well ranking methodologies compare to each other as well as correlate with quantitative measures. Ranking methodologies were found to produce generally similar results, and the ranking methodologies also significantly correlated with some but not all of the actual measures. Ranking methods can be useful and efficient predictors for some types of impact, but should be used carefully for this purpose. More research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of some monitoring methodologies.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369504514Subjects--Topical Terms:

559433
Recreation.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
LDR:02168ntm a2200337K 4500 001 915446
005 20180803131930.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369504514
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10252961
035 $a (MiAaPQ)esf:10669
035 $a AAI10252961
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jackson, Brendan. $3 1188801
245 1 0 $a Comparison of Campsite Impact Monitoring Methodologies.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (59 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
500 $a Adviser: Diane M. Kuehn.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Ranking methodologies for estimating campsite impacts have traditionally been used in addition to (and sometimes in place of) actual measures of impacts. Ranking systems are seen as easier to implement; however, there is concern that these methods may not accurately predict actual measures of impact. Multiple methods of campsite impact monitoring (including both ranking and actual measures) were applied within the Pharaoh Lake Wilderness Area in upstate New York to evaluate how well ranking methodologies compare to each other as well as correlate with quantitative measures. Ranking methodologies were found to produce generally similar results, and the ranking methodologies also significantly correlated with some but not all of the actual measures. Ranking methods can be useful and efficient predictors for some types of impact, but should be used carefully for this purpose. More research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of some monitoring methodologies.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 559433
650 4 $a Forestry. $3 668651
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 1179128
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0478
690 $a 0768
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry. $b Forest Resources Management. $3 1187428
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10252961 $z click for full text (PQDT)

based on 0 review(s)

Multimedia

Reviews

Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers

Export

pickup library