語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Division in Public, Division in Medi...
~
Indiana University.
Division in Public, Division in Media : = A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Division in Public, Division in Media :/
其他題名:
A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements.
作者:
Zha, Ying.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (102 pages)
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
標題:
Journalism. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355633559
Division in Public, Division in Media : = A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements.
Zha, Ying.
Division in Public, Division in Media :
A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements. - 1 online resource (102 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
Thesis (M.A.)--Indiana University, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
Due to historic reasons, even though Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China have similar cultural backgrounds, they have three different political systems and media systems. This study aims to compare and contrast the social media content produced by major media outlets in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China when covering four different political protests: the 2014 Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, the 2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest, the 2015 Taiwan Sunflower Movement, and the 2016 Chinese Memes War. The study found that the three media systems' framing patterns are significantly different. For example, different districts' media blamed each other's government or people for causing the social events. This may be due to the fact that each district's media are influenced by different political systems. This study found the framing patterns of the individual media outlets within the three given media systems are similar, however, even if they have different political affiliations or stands. The reason is likely to be the fact that the selected media are all mainstream media, and therefore they are perhaps subject to their media systems and political pressure about how to disseminate and report the news. The study also found that the given social media coverage of the four protests across the three media systems mostly aligned with expectations for coverage coming from these systems' more traditional media formats.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355633559Subjects--Topical Terms:
659797
Journalism.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Division in Public, Division in Media : = A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements.
LDR
:02607ntm a2200313K 4500
001
915707
005
20180821113842.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355633559
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10742742
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)indiana:15074
035
$a
AAI10742742
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Zha, Ying.
$3
1189175
245
1 0
$a
Division in Public, Division in Media :
$b
A Content Analysis of Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan's Social Media Posts of Social Movements.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (102 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-04.
500
$a
Adviser: Emily Metzgar.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--Indiana University, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Due to historic reasons, even though Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China have similar cultural backgrounds, they have three different political systems and media systems. This study aims to compare and contrast the social media content produced by major media outlets in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China when covering four different political protests: the 2014 Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution, the 2016 Mong Kok Civil Unrest, the 2015 Taiwan Sunflower Movement, and the 2016 Chinese Memes War. The study found that the three media systems' framing patterns are significantly different. For example, different districts' media blamed each other's government or people for causing the social events. This may be due to the fact that each district's media are influenced by different political systems. This study found the framing patterns of the individual media outlets within the three given media systems are similar, however, even if they have different political affiliations or stands. The reason is likely to be the fact that the selected media are all mainstream media, and therefore they are perhaps subject to their media systems and political pressure about how to disseminate and report the news. The study also found that the given social media coverage of the four protests across the three media systems mostly aligned with expectations for coverage coming from these systems' more traditional media formats.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Journalism.
$3
659797
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0391
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Indiana University.
$b
Journalism.
$3
1179489
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10742742
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入