國立虎尾科技大學 |

Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation : = The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation :/
其他題名:	The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
作者:	Angervil, Gilvert.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (284 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-10A(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369849042

Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation : = The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
Angervil, Gilvert.

Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation :The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). - 1 online resource (284 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation analyzes administrative discretion in public policy implementation in application of a new framework of integrative approach to administrative discretion developed from deficiencies of the citizen participation, representative bureaucracy, and private-interest groups democracy frameworks. The new framework holds that public agencies use discretion to integrate in decision making views of elected authorities, private-interest groups, public-interest groups, and other groups that seek to influence implementation. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) policy is used as the case study, and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) is the implementation setting. The dissertation answers the following question: How integrative of group views was DOE's discretionary decision making in the implementation of NCLB? This research applies a structured content analysis method that consists of content analysis and a content analysis schedule (see Jauch, Osborn, & Martin, 1980). Using a Likert question, the dissertation developed six integration levels of DOE's discretionary decision making from not at all integrative to extremely integrative and found that most decisions were very integrative.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369849042Subjects--Topical Terms:

1002398
Public policy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation : = The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
LDR:02426ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 916108
005 20180917084245.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369849042
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10610472
035 $a AAI10610472
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Angervil, Gilvert. $3 1189714
245 1 0 $a Administrative Discretion in Public Policy Implementation : $b The Case of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (284 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Khi V. Thai.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation analyzes administrative discretion in public policy implementation in application of a new framework of integrative approach to administrative discretion developed from deficiencies of the citizen participation, representative bureaucracy, and private-interest groups democracy frameworks. The new framework holds that public agencies use discretion to integrate in decision making views of elected authorities, private-interest groups, public-interest groups, and other groups that seek to influence implementation. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) policy is used as the case study, and the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) is the implementation setting. The dissertation answers the following question: How integrative of group views was DOE's discretionary decision making in the implementation of NCLB? This research applies a structured content analysis method that consists of content analysis and a content analysis schedule (see Jauch, Osborn, & Martin, 1980). Using a Likert question, the dissertation developed six integration levels of DOE's discretionary decision making from not at all integrative to extremely integrative and found that most decisions were very integrative.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 562473
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0617
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Florida Atlantic University. $b Education. $3 1189715
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-10A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10610472 $z click for full text (PQDT)