國立虎尾科技大學 |

Shaping the Fifth Branch : = Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Shaping the Fifth Branch :/
其他題名:	Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011.
作者:	Cloran, Andrew Thomas.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (146 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-02A(E).
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355353204

Shaping the Fifth Branch : = Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011.
Cloran, Andrew Thomas.

Shaping the Fifth Branch :Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011. - 1 online resource (146 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Federal advisory committees (FACs) consist of mostly unelected officials who examine complex policy issues and provide recommendations for action in a final report to one or more branches of government and federal administrative agencies. The proliferation of membership on FACs in recent decades, coupled with their subtle access to policy decision makers on a vast array of government activities, raises many significant questions: Who sits on these committees? Where are they coming from? Why were some FAC nominees chosen to be formal members and not others? To the extent that FACs provide official structures where voices are heard and can influence the direction of policy discussions, a closer inspection of the representativeness of interests on these boards appears as both relevant and necessary for scholarly attention. Moreover, FACs provide a prime candidate to advance interest group research wherein multiple theoretical perspectives can be explored across various federal policy issues. Overall, I find substantial variation in FAC representational patterns, wherein some commission compositions are indicative of pluralism, others are dominated by smaller subsets of elite interests, and still others keep to token forms of representation for all or portions of their respective membership types. Some agencies show remarkable consistency in the distribution of sector representation across years, while others show dramatic shifts in the proportion of representatives from certain sectors. Interests from the business sector, in particular, drive the policy-recommendation commissions for many of the agencies directly responsible for their regulation. In addition, I find that the President is more likely to appoint business-sector representatives into committee environments which allow these actors to form majority representation on highly specific policy areas. Finally, I find that increased levels of Presidential participation in the FAC member selection process translates to substantially increased odds in favor for Presidential, public recognition of the FAC.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355353204Subjects--Topical Terms:

1002398
Public policy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Shaping the Fifth Branch : = Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011.
LDR:03419ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 916125
005 20180917084245.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355353204
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10634018
035 $a (MiAaPQ)indiana:14932
035 $a AAI10634018
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cloran, Andrew Thomas. $3 1189738
245 1 0 $a Shaping the Fifth Branch : $b Interest Representation, Campaign Contributions, and Political Support Across the Federal Advisory Committee System, 1997-2011.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (146 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Matthew Baggetta.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Federal advisory committees (FACs) consist of mostly unelected officials who examine complex policy issues and provide recommendations for action in a final report to one or more branches of government and federal administrative agencies. The proliferation of membership on FACs in recent decades, coupled with their subtle access to policy decision makers on a vast array of government activities, raises many significant questions: Who sits on these committees? Where are they coming from? Why were some FAC nominees chosen to be formal members and not others? To the extent that FACs provide official structures where voices are heard and can influence the direction of policy discussions, a closer inspection of the representativeness of interests on these boards appears as both relevant and necessary for scholarly attention. Moreover, FACs provide a prime candidate to advance interest group research wherein multiple theoretical perspectives can be explored across various federal policy issues. Overall, I find substantial variation in FAC representational patterns, wherein some commission compositions are indicative of pluralism, others are dominated by smaller subsets of elite interests, and still others keep to token forms of representation for all or portions of their respective membership types. Some agencies show remarkable consistency in the distribution of sector representation across years, while others show dramatic shifts in the proportion of representatives from certain sectors. Interests from the business sector, in particular, drive the policy-recommendation commissions for many of the agencies directly responsible for their regulation. In addition, I find that the President is more likely to appoint business-sector representatives into committee environments which allow these actors to form majority representation on highly specific policy areas. Finally, I find that increased levels of Presidential participation in the FAC member selection process translates to substantially increased odds in favor for Presidential, public recognition of the FAC.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 562473
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Indiana University. $b Public Policy. $3 1189263
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-02A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10634018 $z click for full text (PQDT)