國立虎尾科技大學 |

Intertemporal Choice and Democracy.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Intertemporal Choice and Democracy./
作者:	Wang, Austin Horng-En.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (191 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355907971

Intertemporal Choice and Democracy.
Wang, Austin Horng-En.

Intertemporal Choice and Democracy. - 1 online resource (191 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Intertemporal choice refers to how people weigh different outcomes happening at different times. It is called delay discounting in economics, future orientation in psychology, and patience in everyday life. In political science, the concept of intertemporal choice is widely discussed by political theorists and is formalized as a discounting factor in game theoretical models. Despite its theoretical importance, empirical examinations linking intertemporal choice and political behavior are scarce. Through representative surveys and survey experiments in the United States, Taiwan, and Ukraine, this dissertation first shows that intertemporal choice explains the rationality behind sociotropic voting; future-oriented people are much more likely to take into account the future impacts of current national economic changes. Second, patience reduces polarization between rich and poor people on redistributive policy by accounting for future social mobility. Third, patience can increase turnout only if voters perceived enough ideological difference between the candidates; otherwise, higher patience will decrease the willingness to vote. Fourth, intertemporal choice is key to understanding the mobilization in the risky mass protests. In the 2004 Ukraine Orange Revolution, future-oriented citizens were much likely to join the protest in the early stages. Finally, a country-level analysis shows that the average level of patience among citizens correlates with democratic consolidation. These results point to the importance of including the time dimension in the study of political behavior and show that democracy can be improved by extending patience among citizens.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355907971Subjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Intertemporal Choice and Democracy.
LDR:02842ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 916653
005 20180927111921.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355907971
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10750424
035 $a (MiAaPQ)duke:14605
035 $a AAI10750424
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Wang, Austin Horng-En. $3 1190453
245 1 0 $a Intertemporal Choice and Democracy.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (191 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Herbert P. Kitschelt.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Intertemporal choice refers to how people weigh different outcomes happening at different times. It is called delay discounting in economics, future orientation in psychology, and patience in everyday life. In political science, the concept of intertemporal choice is widely discussed by political theorists and is formalized as a discounting factor in game theoretical models. Despite its theoretical importance, empirical examinations linking intertemporal choice and political behavior are scarce. Through representative surveys and survey experiments in the United States, Taiwan, and Ukraine, this dissertation first shows that intertemporal choice explains the rationality behind sociotropic voting; future-oriented people are much more likely to take into account the future impacts of current national economic changes. Second, patience reduces polarization between rich and poor people on redistributive policy by accounting for future social mobility. Third, patience can increase turnout only if voters perceived enough ideological difference between the candidates; otherwise, higher patience will decrease the willingness to vote. Fourth, intertemporal choice is key to understanding the mobilization in the risky mass protests. In the 2004 Ukraine Orange Revolution, future-oriented citizens were much likely to join the protest in the early stages. Finally, a country-level analysis shows that the average level of patience among citizens correlates with democratic consolidation. These results point to the importance of including the time dimension in the study of political behavior and show that democracy can be improved by extending patience among citizens.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Duke University. $b Political Science. $3 1183148
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10750424 $z click for full text (PQDT)