語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
The Impact of Verifiability on the R...
~
The University of Arizona.
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates :/
其他題名:
Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
作者:
Curtis, Remington T.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (68 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:
Accounting. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355954784
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
Curtis, Remington T.
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates :
Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure. - 1 online resource (68 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
Using hand-collected data from the Level 3 reconciliation disclosure, I study the impact of verifiability on the perceived reliability of changes to fair value estimates. Using a value relevance framework, I find that investors perceive indirectly verifiable changes to Level 3 fair value holdings as less reliable than directly verifiable Level 3 changes. I next show that, consistent with a Bayesian updating framework, the value relevance of indirectly verifiable changes is moderated by the overstatement of prior fair value estimates, and by the recency of the investment's acquisition. My study provides new insights on how investors price fair value estimates and also contributes some of the first empirical evidence on the positive relation between the enhancing qualitative characteristic verifiability and investor perceptions of the reliability of information. Relatedly, my study highlights the difference between verifiability and the ASC 820 characteristic observability and finds that observability does not capture investor perceptions of reliability. Finally, the results of my study contradict recent claims that the ASC 820 disclosures are uninformative.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355954784Subjects--Topical Terms:
561166
Accounting.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
LDR
:02433ntm a2200325Ki 4500
001
917126
005
20181005115848.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355954784
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10791838
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)arizona:16176
035
$a
AAI10791838
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Curtis, Remington T.
$3
1191069
245
1 4
$a
The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates :
$b
Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (68 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Jayanthi Sunder.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Using hand-collected data from the Level 3 reconciliation disclosure, I study the impact of verifiability on the perceived reliability of changes to fair value estimates. Using a value relevance framework, I find that investors perceive indirectly verifiable changes to Level 3 fair value holdings as less reliable than directly verifiable Level 3 changes. I next show that, consistent with a Bayesian updating framework, the value relevance of indirectly verifiable changes is moderated by the overstatement of prior fair value estimates, and by the recency of the investment's acquisition. My study provides new insights on how investors price fair value estimates and also contributes some of the first empirical evidence on the positive relation between the enhancing qualitative characteristic verifiability and investor perceptions of the reliability of information. Relatedly, my study highlights the difference between verifiability and the ASC 820 characteristic observability and finds that observability does not capture investor perceptions of reliability. Finally, the results of my study contradict recent claims that the ASC 820 disclosures are uninformative.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Accounting.
$3
561166
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0272
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
The University of Arizona.
$b
Accounting.
$3
1191070
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-09A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10791838
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入