國立虎尾科技大學 |

Consent versus controversy : = Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Consent versus controversy :/
其他題名:	Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
作者:	Dixson, Mary Campbell.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (275 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International64-07A.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780496470419

Consent versus controversy : = Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
Dixson, Mary Campbell.

Consent versus controversy :Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship. - 1 online resource (275 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.

Includes bibliographical references

Americans crave harmony and agreement in civic life, yet conflict and argument are vital to the success of the nation. The ability to resolve civic disputes demands an informed, active, and rhetorically capable people. This study examines the extent to which conflict and controversy are included in the education of citizens. Specifically, I ask: (1) What are students' overall attitudes toward civic argumentation and conflict? (2) Are students being provided with sufficient opportunity to engage with others in profitable, if contentious, discussions? (3) Is the role of controversy in a democracy adequately represented in civics education? To answer these questions I conducted a content analysis of interaction held in high school civics courses, including student essays, classroom interactions, and textbook readings. My findings indicate that (1) textbooks provide a fairly well-rounded image of political controversy, characteristically describing it as important, inevitable, and manageable; (2) students are pragmatic in their conceptions of controversy, avoiding the emotional and ideological aspects of political conflict; (3) students evade conflict, considering it to be aberrant, destructive, and avoidable. Overall, I argue that because of their fear of becoming implicated in such a frightening political world, young citizens avoid accepting their own power and responsibility for effecting political change. Consequently, I argue that civic educators need to examine more closely how they conceive of citizenship. To help students be more prepared to take on their role as engaged citizens, civic education should increase its focus in four major areas: engagement, critical thinking, ideology, and dialogue. Ultimately to generate productive citizens, civics education must change its objective as well as its methodology.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780496470419Subjects--Topical Terms:

556422
Communication.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Consent versus controversy : = Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
LDR:03088ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 917262
005 20181009045510.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2002 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780496470419
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3099449
035 $a AAI3099449
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dixson, Mary Campbell. $3 1191257
245 1 0 $a Consent versus controversy : $b Communication, conflict and the teaching of citizenship.
264 0 $c 2002
300 $a 1 online resource (275 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 64-07, Section: A, page: 2310.
500 $a Supervisor: Roderick P. Hart.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Americans crave harmony and agreement in civic life, yet conflict and argument are vital to the success of the nation. The ability to resolve civic disputes demands an informed, active, and rhetorically capable people. This study examines the extent to which conflict and controversy are included in the education of citizens. Specifically, I ask: (1) What are students' overall attitudes toward civic argumentation and conflict? (2) Are students being provided with sufficient opportunity to engage with others in profitable, if contentious, discussions? (3) Is the role of controversy in a democracy adequately represented in civics education? To answer these questions I conducted a content analysis of interaction held in high school civics courses, including student essays, classroom interactions, and textbook readings. My findings indicate that (1) textbooks provide a fairly well-rounded image of political controversy, characteristically describing it as important, inevitable, and manageable; (2) students are pragmatic in their conceptions of controversy, avoiding the emotional and ideological aspects of political conflict; (3) students evade conflict, considering it to be aberrant, destructive, and avoidable. Overall, I argue that because of their fear of becoming implicated in such a frightening political world, young citizens avoid accepting their own power and responsibility for effecting political change. Consequently, I argue that civic educators need to examine more closely how they conceive of citizenship. To help students be more prepared to take on their role as engaged citizens, civic education should increase its focus in four major areas: engagement, critical thinking, ideology, and dialogue. Ultimately to generate productive citizens, civics education must change its objective as well as its methodology.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Communication. $3 556422
650 4 $a Social sciences education. $3 1179940
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Austin. $3 1182055
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 64-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3099449 $z click for full text (PQDT)