國立虎尾科技大學 |

A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software./
作者:	Speck, Ricky Lee.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (238 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-07B(E).
標題:	Packaging. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781303791512

A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software.
Speck, Ricky Lee.

A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software. - 1 online resource (238 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2014.

Includes bibliographical references

Against a backdrop of increasing demand for products, the packaging industry is continually searching for ways to meet the needs of consumers while simultaneously improving the environmentally sustainability of packaging. This requires making informed decisions based at least in part on knowledge of the environmental impacts attributable to the different packaging options being considered. Many companies have turned to using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to obtain the necessary environmental impact information. To support this effort, several software programs have been developed to aid in doing an LCA. These programs vary considerably in complexity and focus, leading to questions of how similar are the results they provide. To study the consistency of results across LCA software programs, nine common packaging systems were modeled in each of five different programs: GaBi, SimaPro, openLCA, COMPASS, and Package Modeling. Comparison of the LCA information provided by these programs for the packaging systems showed several significant differences. To better understand why the differences occurred, four simplified systems were created with the intent of minimizing the number of variables involved in the system models. Each of these systems consisted of obtaining and disposing of a single basic packaging material: aluminum, glass, corrugated board, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Once again a comparison of results showed significant differences. Using information from these basic material comparisons, and making use of the transparency in LCA calculations provided by GaBi and SimaPro, a study was done that traced the causes of the inconsistencies in results back to how implementations of assessment methods differed between the two programs. A comparison of 14 combinations of basic materials and impact categories involving 3 different assessment methods found 98 instances of characterization factors differing between GaBi and SimaPro. These differences in characterization factors accounted for all the discrepancies in results between the two programs. No errors in calculations were found with either program, and there were no significant differences in the type or amount of inputs and emissions in the life cycle inventories from the two programs.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781303791512Subjects--Topical Terms:

999828
Packaging.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software.
LDR:03497ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 917276
005 20181009045510.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2014 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781303791512
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3614162
035 $a (MiAaPQ)grad.msu:12667
035 $a AAI3614162
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Speck, Ricky Lee. $3 1191277
245 1 2 $a A comparative analysis of commercially available life cycle assessment software.
264 0 $c 2014
300 $a 1 online resource (238 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Selke.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2014.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Against a backdrop of increasing demand for products, the packaging industry is continually searching for ways to meet the needs of consumers while simultaneously improving the environmentally sustainability of packaging. This requires making informed decisions based at least in part on knowledge of the environmental impacts attributable to the different packaging options being considered. Many companies have turned to using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to obtain the necessary environmental impact information. To support this effort, several software programs have been developed to aid in doing an LCA. These programs vary considerably in complexity and focus, leading to questions of how similar are the results they provide. To study the consistency of results across LCA software programs, nine common packaging systems were modeled in each of five different programs: GaBi, SimaPro, openLCA, COMPASS, and Package Modeling. Comparison of the LCA information provided by these programs for the packaging systems showed several significant differences. To better understand why the differences occurred, four simplified systems were created with the intent of minimizing the number of variables involved in the system models. Each of these systems consisted of obtaining and disposing of a single basic packaging material: aluminum, glass, corrugated board, and polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Once again a comparison of results showed significant differences. Using information from these basic material comparisons, and making use of the transparency in LCA calculations provided by GaBi and SimaPro, a study was done that traced the causes of the inconsistencies in results back to how implementations of assessment methods differed between the two programs. A comparison of 14 combinations of basic materials and impact categories involving 3 different assessment methods found 98 instances of characterization factors differing between GaBi and SimaPro. These differences in characterization factors accounted for all the discrepancies in results between the two programs. No errors in calculations were found with either program, and there were no significant differences in the type or amount of inputs and emissions in the life cycle inventories from the two programs.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Packaging. $3 999828
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0549
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Packaging - Doctor of Philosophy. $3 1191278
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-07B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3614162 $z click for full text (PQDT)