國立虎尾科技大學 |

Beliefs about Addiction : = The Role of Political Ideology.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Beliefs about Addiction :/
其他題名:	The Role of Political Ideology.
作者:	Gerstel-Friedman, Jaclin.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (103 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05B(E).
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355573053

Beliefs about Addiction : = The Role of Political Ideology.
Gerstel-Friedman, Jaclin.

Beliefs about Addiction :The Role of Political Ideology. - 1 online resource (103 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

This study was designed to examine the role of political ideology on agreement with different models of addiction, if ideology relates to whether the statements were categorized as facts or as beliefs, and whether these differences would interact with beliefs about science. In addition, this study investigated if liberals and conservatives expressed differences in their estimation of other people's opinions about addiction. A total of 233 participant responses were collected through the website Mechanical Turk. Results show that statements portraying addiction as a disease were most likely to be rated as factual and agreed with, regardless of political ideology. Statements portraying addiction as a choice were most likely to be perceived as beliefs, rather than facts, and conservatives were more likely than the other ideological groups to agree with choice statements. The findings also suggest there are differences in how liberals and conservatives endorsed beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge. Finally, the results indicate conservatives are more likely to overestimate the popularity of their opinions and assume their opinions are shared by other conservatives and the general population. Liberals were found to underestimate the likelihood they would share opinions with conservatives and the general population. Liberals, moderates, and conservatives did not display bias in the accuracy of their prediction of liberals' opinions.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355573053Subjects--Topical Terms:

555998
Psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Beliefs about Addiction : = The Role of Political Ideology.
LDR:02696ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 917416
005 20181012133445.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355573053
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10682734
035 $a (MiAaPQ)fordham:11092
035 $a AAI10682734
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Gerstel-Friedman, Jaclin. $3 1191457
245 1 0 $a Beliefs about Addiction : $b The Role of Political Ideology.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (103 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Mitchell Rabinowitz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fordham University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study was designed to examine the role of political ideology on agreement with different models of addiction, if ideology relates to whether the statements were categorized as facts or as beliefs, and whether these differences would interact with beliefs about science. In addition, this study investigated if liberals and conservatives expressed differences in their estimation of other people's opinions about addiction. A total of 233 participant responses were collected through the website Mechanical Turk. Results show that statements portraying addiction as a disease were most likely to be rated as factual and agreed with, regardless of political ideology. Statements portraying addiction as a choice were most likely to be perceived as beliefs, rather than facts, and conservatives were more likely than the other ideological groups to agree with choice statements. The findings also suggest there are differences in how liberals and conservatives endorsed beliefs about the nature of scientific knowledge. Finally, the results indicate conservatives are more likely to overestimate the popularity of their opinions and assume their opinions are shared by other conservatives and the general population. Liberals were found to underestimate the likelihood they would share opinions with conservatives and the general population. Liberals, moderates, and conservatives did not display bias in the accuracy of their prediction of liberals' opinions.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Fordham University. $b Psychological & Educational Services. $3 1181848
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10682734 $z click for full text (PQDT)