國立虎尾科技大學 |

Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit./
作者:	Stavish, Kenneth V.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (70 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07B(E).
標題:	Engineering. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355615814

Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit.
Stavish, Kenneth V.

Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit. - 1 online resource (70 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Resilience is explained as an entity's capacity to survive and recover from disruptions. Approaches to design resilient systems are in growing demand; however, there have been few demonstrations for measuring and quantifying systems resilience. This research presents a Resilience Analysis regarding Inertial Navigation System (INS) architectures. Specifically for the case study at hand, it is not clear which INS architecture to choose (tightly coupled or loosely coupled) for resilience. This research tests whether Robustness and Recovery measures of effectiveness (MOEs) can be used to determine which INS architecture is most resilient.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355615814Subjects--Topical Terms:

561152
Engineering.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit.
LDR:03006ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 917840
005 20181022132248.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355615814
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10743838
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gwu:13982
035 $a AAI10743838
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Stavish, Kenneth V. $3 1192019
245 1 0 $a Resilience Analysis of Inertial Navigation Systems (INS) through an Enhanced INS Tool Kit.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (70 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Timothy Blackburn; Andreas Garstenauer.
502 $a Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Resilience is explained as an entity's capacity to survive and recover from disruptions. Approaches to design resilient systems are in growing demand; however, there have been few demonstrations for measuring and quantifying systems resilience. This research presents a Resilience Analysis regarding Inertial Navigation System (INS) architectures. Specifically for the case study at hand, it is not clear which INS architecture to choose (tightly coupled or loosely coupled) for resilience. This research tests whether Robustness and Recovery measures of effectiveness (MOEs) can be used to determine which INS architecture is most resilient.
520 $a The methodology of this research included enhancing an INS Tool Kit with Resilience Analysis functions. The INS Tool Kit was used to collect resilience data for different INS configurations dealing with Global Positioning System (GPS) outages. Robustness and Recovery data were collected for 500 observations of five different INS configurations. Three configurations were loosely coupled and two were tightly coupled; therefore, 1500 observations of resilience data for loosely coupled INS were compared to 1000 observations for tightly coupled INS. Using data from this Resilience Analysis, a series of nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests showed there is a statistically significant difference between tightly coupled and loosely coupled INS architectures in terms of resilience. Based on these results, greater resilience to GPS outages can be added to the list of advantages for tightly coupled INS architectures. The conclusion of this research is that Robustness and Recovery measures can be used to determine and compare the resilience of different INS architectures.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Engineering. $3 561152
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 1148479
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0537
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Engineering Management. $3 1179162
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10743838 $z click for full text (PQDT)